Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

lib: delay access to CLI option to pre-execution #30778

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

joyeecheung
Copy link
Member

CLI options should not be added through the config binding, instead
they are already available in the JS land via
require('internal/options'). Also CLI options in principle should
be processed in pre-execution instead of bootstrap scripts.

cc @ @cjihrig

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

CLI options should not be added through the config binding, instead
they are already available in the JS land via
`require('internal/options')`. Also CLI options in principle should
be processed in pre-execution instead of bootstrap scripts.
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. label Dec 3, 2019
@addaleax addaleax added the wasi Issues and PRs related to the WebAssembly System Interface. label Dec 3, 2019
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@ZYSzys ZYSzys added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Dec 5, 2019
@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Dec 5, 2019

Landed in 28efa4f

@Trott Trott closed this Dec 5, 2019
Trott pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2019
CLI options should not be added through the config binding, instead
they are already available in the JS land via
`require('internal/options')`. Also CLI options in principle should
be processed in pre-execution instead of bootstrap scripts.

PR-URL: #30778
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Yongsheng Zhang <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2019
CLI options should not be added through the config binding, instead
they are already available in the JS land via
`require('internal/options')`. Also CLI options in principle should
be processed in pre-execution instead of bootstrap scripts.

PR-URL: #30778
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Yongsheng Zhang <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Dec 13, 2019
cjihrig added a commit to cjihrig/node that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2019
This commit ensures that the WASI module cannot be require()'ed
without a CLI flag while the module is still experimental.

This fixes a regression from
nodejs#30778.
danbev pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2019
This commit ensures that the WASI module cannot be require()'ed
without a CLI flag while the module is still experimental.

This fixes a regression from
#30778.

PR-URL: #30963
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: David Carlier <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2019
This commit ensures that the WASI module cannot be require()'ed
without a CLI flag while the module is still experimental.

This fixes a regression from
#30778.

PR-URL: #30963
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: David Carlier <[email protected]>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2020
CLI options should not be added through the config binding, instead
they are already available in the JS land via
`require('internal/options')`. Also CLI options in principle should
be processed in pre-execution instead of bootstrap scripts.

PR-URL: #30778
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Yongsheng Zhang <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2020
This commit ensures that the WASI module cannot be require()'ed
without a CLI flag while the module is still experimental.

This fixes a regression from
#30778.

PR-URL: #30963
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: David Carlier <[email protected]>
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2020
CLI options should not be added through the config binding, instead
they are already available in the JS land via
`require('internal/options')`. Also CLI options in principle should
be processed in pre-execution instead of bootstrap scripts.

PR-URL: #30778
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Yongsheng Zhang <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2020
This commit ensures that the WASI module cannot be require()'ed
without a CLI flag while the module is still experimental.

This fixes a regression from
#30778.

PR-URL: #30963
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: David Carlier <[email protected]>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Feb 8, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. wasi Issues and PRs related to the WebAssembly System Interface.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants