-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: add mustCall() to test-inspector-contexts #30649
Conversation
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Added a second commit to check for errors in |
Added a third commit to remove destructuring that was making the test harder to read/understand, at least for me. Added a fourth commit to add logging for a possible/probable infinite loop (or infinite-ish loop) that may be why the test times out sometimes on CI. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
@nodejs/testing @nodejs/inspector |
@nodejs/collaborators |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Welp, this at least has the desired effect of supplying more information about why test-inspector-contexts sometimes hangs in CI. 13:29:09 not ok 1312 sequential/test-inspector-contexts
13:29:09 ---
13:29:09 duration_ms: 149.140
13:29:09 severity: fail
13:29:09 exitcode: 1
13:29:09 stack: |-
13:29:09 timeout
13:29:09 Testing context created/destroyed notifications
13:29:09 Checking/waiting for GC.
13:29:09 ... So it looks like it just runs the first |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Landed in ea7a6f9...15146e6 |
In test-inspector-contexts, if mainContextPromise is modified such that the `method` argument is changed to something invalid, the test still passes and the second part of the test never runs. Use `common.mustCall()` to cause the test to fail if the second part of the test does not run. Refs: #30519 (comment) PR-URL: #30649 Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
If session.post() generates an error, it is currently ignored. Add check for error by adding a callback to session.post() invocation. PR-URL: #30649 Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
As I'm working with this test, I'm finding the destructuring of assert and vm to make this test harder to read/understand. So I'm taking the liberty of removing them. PR-URL: #30649 Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
test-inspector-contexts may be entering an infinite loop (or very long-running loop) in CI, resulting in flakiness. Or maybe not. Add logging to find out. PR-URL: #30649 Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
In test-inspector-contexts, if mainContextPromise is modified such that the `method` argument is changed to something invalid, the test still passes and the second part of the test never runs. Use `common.mustCall()` to cause the test to fail if the second part of the test does not run. Refs: #30519 (comment) PR-URL: #30649 Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
If session.post() generates an error, it is currently ignored. Add check for error by adding a callback to session.post() invocation. PR-URL: #30649 Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
As I'm working with this test, I'm finding the destructuring of assert and vm to make this test harder to read/understand. So I'm taking the liberty of removing them. PR-URL: #30649 Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
test-inspector-contexts may be entering an infinite loop (or very long-running loop) in CI, resulting in flakiness. Or maybe not. Add logging to find out. PR-URL: #30649 Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
In test-inspector-contexts, if mainContextPromise is modified such that the `method` argument is changed to something invalid, the test still passes and the second part of the test never runs. Use `common.mustCall()` to cause the test to fail if the second part of the test does not run. Refs: #30519 (comment) PR-URL: #30649 Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
If session.post() generates an error, it is currently ignored. Add check for error by adding a callback to session.post() invocation. PR-URL: #30649 Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
As I'm working with this test, I'm finding the destructuring of assert and vm to make this test harder to read/understand. So I'm taking the liberty of removing them. PR-URL: #30649 Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
test-inspector-contexts may be entering an infinite loop (or very long-running loop) in CI, resulting in flakiness. Or maybe not. Add logging to find out. PR-URL: #30649 Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
In test-inspector-contexts, if mainContextPromise is modified such that
the
method
argument is changed to something invalid, the test stillpasses and the second part of the test never runs. Use
common.mustCall()
to cause the test to fail if the second part of thetest does not run.
Refs: #30519 (comment)
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passes