Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

src: isolate->Dispose() order consistency #30181

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

codebytere
Copy link
Member

@codebytere codebytere commented Oct 30, 2019

Removes comment from UnregisterIsolate() specifying that Isolate::Dispose() should be called after UnregisterIsolate() since that's no longer the case.

This was originally added to account for issues in V8 but now there should be no relevant tasks running during either call so their order is fungible. However, for consistency's sake, we were calling most of these in the same order (dispose and then unregister) so this also moves a straggling call from node_worker to bring it in line with all others.

cc @addaleax

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. worker Issues and PRs related to Worker support. labels Oct 30, 2019
@addaleax addaleax added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Oct 30, 2019
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@codebytere
Copy link
Member Author

@codebytere
Copy link
Member Author

Landed in 312c02d

@codebytere codebytere closed this Nov 1, 2019
@codebytere codebytere deleted the consistent-dispose branch November 1, 2019 21:10
codebytere added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2019
PR-URL: #30181
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: David Carlier <[email protected]>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2019
PR-URL: #30181
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: David Carlier <[email protected]>
@targos targos mentioned this pull request Nov 5, 2019
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2019
PR-URL: #30181
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: David Carlier <[email protected]>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2019
PR-URL: #30181
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: David Carlier <[email protected]>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2019
PR-URL: #30181
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: David Carlier <[email protected]>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2019
PR-URL: #30181
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: David Carlier <[email protected]>
addaleax added a commit to addaleax/node that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2019
I previously thought the order of these calls was no longer
relevant. I was wrong.

This commit undoes the changes from 312c02d, adds a comment
explaining why I was wrong, and flips the order of the calls
elsewhere for consistency, the latter having been the goal
of 312c02d.

Fixes: nodejs#30846
Refs: nodejs#30181
Trott pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 14, 2019
I previously thought the order of these calls was no longer
relevant. I was wrong.

This commit undoes the changes from 312c02d, adds a comment
explaining why I was wrong, and flips the order of the calls
elsewhere for consistency, the latter having been the goal
of 312c02d.

Fixes: #30846
Refs: #30181

PR-URL: #30909
Reviewed-By: Shelley Vohr <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: David Carlier <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2019
I previously thought the order of these calls was no longer
relevant. I was wrong.

This commit undoes the changes from 312c02d, adds a comment
explaining why I was wrong, and flips the order of the calls
elsewhere for consistency, the latter having been the goal
of 312c02d.

Fixes: #30846
Refs: #30181

PR-URL: #30909
Reviewed-By: Shelley Vohr <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: David Carlier <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2020
I previously thought the order of these calls was no longer
relevant. I was wrong.

This commit undoes the changes from 312c02d, adds a comment
explaining why I was wrong, and flips the order of the calls
elsewhere for consistency, the latter having been the goal
of 312c02d.

Fixes: #30846
Refs: #30181

PR-URL: #30909
Reviewed-By: Shelley Vohr <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: David Carlier <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2020
I previously thought the order of these calls was no longer
relevant. I was wrong.

This commit undoes the changes from 312c02d, adds a comment
explaining why I was wrong, and flips the order of the calls
elsewhere for consistency, the latter having been the goal
of 312c02d.

Fixes: #30846
Refs: #30181

PR-URL: #30909
Reviewed-By: Shelley Vohr <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: David Carlier <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
@addaleax addaleax added the v8 platform Issues and PRs related to Node's v8::Platform implementation. label Feb 18, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. v8 platform Issues and PRs related to Node's v8::Platform implementation. worker Issues and PRs related to Worker support.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants