Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Makefile: use existing variable to reduce complexity #2883

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

brycebaril
Copy link
Contributor

cc @rvagg

@Fishrock123 Fishrock123 added the build Issues and PRs related to build files or the CI. label Sep 15, 2015
@rvagg
Copy link
Member

rvagg commented Sep 16, 2015

I might use a nightly to test this, it looks good but hard to test locally

@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Mar 22, 2016

@brycebaril @rvagg ... ping

@jasnell jasnell added the stalled Issues and PRs that are stalled. label Mar 22, 2016
@jbergstroem
Copy link
Member

If no one else wants to handle this I'm happy to resume. Generally looks good to me; just need to test a bit.

@Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor

@jbergstroem I think the silence is a go-ahead

@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Feb 28, 2017

ping @nodejs/build

@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Mar 24, 2017

ping @jbergstroem

@fhinkel
Copy link
Member

fhinkel commented May 23, 2017

There hasn't been any progress here for quite a while. I'm going ahead and closing this. Feel free to re-open or ping a collaborator if you want it to stay open.

@fhinkel fhinkel closed this May 23, 2017
@gibfahn gibfahn reopened this May 23, 2017
@gibfahn
Copy link
Member

gibfahn commented May 23, 2017

Thanks for the prod @fhinkel !

This seems like a clear improvement, and should be really easy to review. @nodejs/build @nodejs/release can anyone else take a look?

@brycebaril sorry this got lost.

Amazingly this still patches cleanly (with git am -3), I guess the Makefile hasn't changed much.

Copy link
Member

@addaleax addaleax left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don’t see any reason not to land this today :D

Copy link
Member

@gibfahn gibfahn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Given TARNAME=node-$(FULLVERSION) is set earlier, this seems pretty clearly okay.

@gibfahn gibfahn self-assigned this May 23, 2017
@gibfahn gibfahn removed the stalled Issues and PRs that are stalled. label May 23, 2017
@fhinkel
Copy link
Member

fhinkel commented Jun 7, 2017

Thanks. Landed in ca50a19

@fhinkel fhinkel closed this Jun 7, 2017
fhinkel pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2017
PR-URL: #2883
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Sam Roberts <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Franziska Hinkelmann <[email protected]>
jasnell pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2017
PR-URL: #2883
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Sam Roberts <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Franziska Hinkelmann <[email protected]>
@gibfahn gibfahn mentioned this pull request Jun 15, 2017
3 tasks
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2017
PR-URL: #2883
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Sam Roberts <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Franziska Hinkelmann <[email protected]>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Jul 18, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
build Issues and PRs related to build files or the CI.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants