Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

doc: fix deprecation listing for OutgoingMessage._headers/_headerNames #27574

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

dnalborczyk
Copy link
Contributor

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added deprecations Issues and PRs related to deprecations. doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. labels May 6, 2019
@@ -1364,7 +1364,7 @@ The `NODE_REPL_MODE` environment variable is used to set the underlying
removed. Please use `sloppy` instead.

<a id="DEP0066"></a>
### DEP0066: outgoingMessage.\_headers, outgoingMessage.\_headerNames
### DEP0066: outgoingMessage.prototype.\_headers, outgoingMessage.prototype.\_headerNames
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think there is nothing wrong with the original. outgoingMessage refers to an instance of OutgoingMessage so outgoingMessage._headers is ok.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@dnalborczyk dnalborczyk May 6, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@lpinca

compare https://nodejs.org/dist/latest-v12.x/docs/api/deprecations.html#deprecations_dep0066_outgoingmessage_headers_outgoingmessage_headernames with https://nodejs.org/dist/latest-v12.x/docs/api/deprecations.html#deprecations_dep0067_outgoingmessage_prototype_renderheaders

as well as the deprecation message itself:

}, 'OutgoingMessage.prototype._headers is deprecated', 'DEP0066'),

I think that consistency is key as well as finding the doc with a search engine (SEO).

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh ok, so it's for consistency.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In that case can you please capitalize outgoingMessage? It should be OutgoingMessage.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ah, good catch! I'll fix that as well ...

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

just noticed another inconsistency: also added prototype to the suggested methods, compare to: https://nodejs.org/dist/latest-v12.x/docs/api/deprecations.html#deprecations_dep0001_http_outgoingmessage_prototype_flush

which also mentions the module name: http.OutgoingMessage :/

@lpinca
Copy link
Member

lpinca commented May 7, 2019

Can you please make the linter happy? See https://travis-ci.com/nodejs/node/jobs/198041047

@BridgeAR
Copy link
Member

@BridgeAR BridgeAR added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label May 13, 2019
@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented May 19, 2019

@addaleax
Copy link
Member

Landed in 91ec5bf, thanks for the PR! 🎉

@addaleax addaleax closed this May 26, 2019
addaleax pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 26, 2019
PR-URL: #27574
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 28, 2019
PR-URL: #27574
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
@targos targos mentioned this pull request Jun 3, 2019
@dnalborczyk dnalborczyk deleted the patch-3 branch June 5, 2021 02:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. deprecations Issues and PRs related to deprecations. doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants