Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

buffer: remove checkNumberType() #24815

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

cjihrig
Copy link
Contributor

@cjihrig cjihrig commented Dec 3, 2018

checkNumberType() was a very thin wrapper around validateNumber(). This commit removes checkNumberType() and used validateNumber() directly instead.

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

checkNumberType() was a very thin wrapper around validateNumber().
This commit removes checkNumberType() and used validateNumber()
directly instead.
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the buffer Issues and PRs related to the buffer subsystem. label Dec 3, 2018
@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Dec 5, 2018

@Trott Trott added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Dec 5, 2018
@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Dec 5, 2018

Landed in adbdaf9

@Trott Trott closed this Dec 5, 2018
Trott pushed a commit to Trott/io.js that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2018
checkNumberType() was a very thin wrapper around validateNumber().
This commit removes checkNumberType() and used validateNumber()
directly instead.

PR-URL: nodejs#24815
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
@cjihrig cjihrig deleted the remove branch December 5, 2018 23:27
BridgeAR pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 6, 2018
checkNumberType() was a very thin wrapper around validateNumber().
This commit removes checkNumberType() and used validateNumber()
directly instead.

PR-URL: #24815
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
@BridgeAR BridgeAR mentioned this pull request Dec 6, 2018
4 tasks
BridgeAR pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2018
checkNumberType() was a very thin wrapper around validateNumber().
This commit removes checkNumberType() and used validateNumber()
directly instead.

PR-URL: #24815
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
BridgeAR pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2018
checkNumberType() was a very thin wrapper around validateNumber().
This commit removes checkNumberType() and used validateNumber()
directly instead.

PR-URL: #24815
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
refack pushed a commit to refack/node that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2019
checkNumberType() was a very thin wrapper around validateNumber().
This commit removes checkNumberType() and used validateNumber()
directly instead.

PR-URL: nodejs#24815
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2019
checkNumberType() was a very thin wrapper around validateNumber().
This commit removes checkNumberType() and used validateNumber()
directly instead.

PR-URL: #24815
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
@BethGriggs BethGriggs mentioned this pull request Feb 12, 2019
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2019
checkNumberType() was a very thin wrapper around validateNumber().
This commit removes checkNumberType() and used validateNumber()
directly instead.

PR-URL: #24815
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2019
checkNumberType() was a very thin wrapper around validateNumber().
This commit removes checkNumberType() and used validateNumber()
directly instead.

PR-URL: #24815
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. buffer Issues and PRs related to the buffer subsystem.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants