-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
doc: fix filehandle.truncate sample codes #20913
doc: fix filehandle.truncate sample codes #20913
Conversation
doc/api/fs.md
Outdated
const fd = await fsPromises.open('temp.txt', 'r+'); | ||
await fsPromises.ftruncate(fd, 4); | ||
const filehandle = await fsPromises.open('temp.txt', 'r+'); | ||
await filehandle.truncate(4); | ||
console.log(fs.readFileSync('temp.txt', 'utf8')); // Prints: Node |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
these should really be....
let filehandle;
try {
const filehandle = await fsPromises.open('temp.txt', 'r+');
await filehandle.truncate(4);
} finally {
await filehandle.close();
}
While the filehandle
will close automatically on garbage collection in order to prevent the leak, it should be closed manually. A process warning would be emitted if it is allowed to close on gc.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jasnell sorry for the tangent: we really need a better resources story in general - if this is tricky consider how hard this is with 3 concurrent handles.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One thing that might work here API wise is a disposer:
await fsPromises.open('temp.txt', 'r+', async handle => {
await handle.truncate(4);
});
This doesn't solve the harder problem of dealing with multiple resources at once though.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I certainly don't disagree :-)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jasnell
Thank you for your comment. The codes were fixed with filehandle.close
. Please check them again.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jasnell - what do you think the right avenue to discuss such a cross-cutting concern is? I'm not sure what the right team/working-group/avenue is.
I'm a little lost here :)
Fix sample codes because `filehandle.close` was not called when error occured. `filehandle.close` should be called manually.
Collaborators - please 👍 if you agree with fast-tracking this. |
doc/api/fs.md
Outdated
filehandle = await fsPromises.open('temp.txt', 'r+'); | ||
await filehandle.truncate(4); | ||
} finally { | ||
if (filehandle !== null) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What can make undefined filehandle
be null
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The open
throwing, since that was unclear it'll definitely be unclear for some users - we should probably add a comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If open
throws, will not the filehandle
remain undefined
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I could have sworn that was a !=
and not a !==
, good spotting!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I mean, shoud not we initialize filehandle
as null
or use non-strict comparison or even if (filehandle)
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should. I was saying "good spotting" for spotting that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, GitHub did not update timely with new comments)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@vsemozhetbyt @benjamingr
filehandle
is not undefined
. It is defined and initialized as null
.
let filehandle;
But it is unclear for some users.
The below code may be more clearly for users. It looks better?
async function doTruncate() {
let filehandle = null;
try {
filehandle = await fsPromises.open('temp.txt', 'r+');
await filehandle.truncate(4);
} finally {
if (filehandle) {
// close the file if it is opened.
await filehandle.close();
}
}
console.log(fs.readFileSync('temp.txt', 'utf8')); // Prints: Node
}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
let filehandle;
When you do that in JavaScript that initializes the value to undefined
. You can verify this in the following script:
let filehandle;
console.log(filehandle);
The below code may be more clearly for users. It looks better?
Yes, thank you.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@benjamingr
oh, sorry! I was wrong and fixed them.
doc/api/fs.md
Outdated
console.log(fs.readFileSync('temp.txt', 'utf8')); // Prints Node.js\0\0\0 | ||
} | ||
|
||
doTruncate().catch(console.error); | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit: unneeded empty line.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@vsemozhetbyt Fixed it. Thanks.
Fix sample codes for filehandle.truncate to make them more clearly.
CI-lite: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request-lite/749/ (one unrelated fail of a flaky test). |
PR-URL: #20913 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Landed in ac82261 |
PR-URL: #20913 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passes