-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
url: fix WHATWG URL host formatting error caused by port string #20493
Conversation
This is a pretty serious bug and I'm wondering if these ambiguous names (host vs hostname) affected more stuffs in the code base? |
cc @nodejs/url |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The logic needs to be fixed slightly.
lib/internal/url.js
Outdated
@@ -400,7 +400,9 @@ Object.defineProperties(URL.prototype, { | |||
ret += '@'; | |||
} | |||
ret += options.unicode ? | |||
domainToUnicode(this.host) : this.host; | |||
domainToUnicode(this.hostname) : this.hostname; | |||
if (ctx.port !== '') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this should be ctx.port !== null
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The WHATWG URL API uses ''
as the empty value, not null
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
> new url.URL("https://nodejs.org/en/")
URL {
href: 'https://nodejs.org/en/',
origin: 'https://nodejs.org',
protocol: 'https:',
username: '',
password: '',
host: 'nodejs.org',
hostname: 'nodejs.org',
port: '',
pathname: '/en/',
search: '',
searchParams: URLSearchParams {},
hash: '' }
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh my bad! This is the internal context...
lib/internal/url.js
Outdated
@@ -388,7 +388,7 @@ Object.defineProperties(URL.prototype, { | |||
}, options); | |||
const ctx = this[context]; | |||
var ret = ctx.scheme; | |||
if (ctx.host !== null) { | |||
if (ctx.hostname !== null) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This should also be ctx.host !== null
. The hostname
change only applies below.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You're right, URLContext
uses null
:
const { URL } = require('url');
const myURL = new URL('https://nodejs.org/en/');
const kContext = Object.getOwnPropertySymbols(myURL)[0];
console.log(myURL[kContext]);
URLContext {
flags: 400,
scheme: 'https:',
username: '',
password: '',
host: 'nodejs.org',
port: null,
path: [ 'en', '' ],
query: null,
fragment: null }
FWIW you might want to contribute your test case back to https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/tree/master/url — clearly this is a case that's not covered by the official tests. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should be good to go now.
Although I agree with this general sentiment, the url.format() API is nonstandard, so it doesn't make sense to test this in the official tests. |
Yeah, the Also as the name implies |
@jasnell @nodejs/url I don't know if it makes sense to throw in the non-internal part of our JS API when the non-standard methods like |
Throwing is fine, I think. |
CI re-run for node-test-commit-arm-fanned: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-arm-fanned/977/ |
@joyeecheung I can’t really tell whether your suggestion is something for this PR or not – should we wait with landing this or is it good to go? |
@trivikr Could you help me to re-run node-test-commit as well? |
@addaleax This PR is good to go, the error handling can be changed in another PR |
Landed in 2a96ee2 Congrats on your first commit in Node.js core and becoming a Contributor! 🎉 |
The current url.format implementation will return an invalid URL string without the host if there is a port and unicode: true. This unexpected behavior is caused by domainToUnicode, which expects a hostname instead of a host string according to node_url.cc. Adds both a fix and a test for the issue. PR-URL: #20493 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Tiancheng "Timothy" Gu <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Daijiro Wachi <[email protected]>
The current url.format implementation will return an invalid URL string without the host if there is a port and unicode: true. This unexpected behavior is caused by domainToUnicode, which expects a hostname instead of a host string according to node_url.cc. Adds both a fix and a test for the issue. PR-URL: #20493 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Tiancheng "Timothy" Gu <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Daijiro Wachi <[email protected]>
The current url.format implementation will return an invalid URL string without the host if there is a port and unicode: true. This unexpected behavior is caused by domainToUnicode, which expects a hostname instead of a host string according to node_url.cc. Adds both a fix and a test for the issue. PR-URL: #20493 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Tiancheng "Timothy" Gu <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Daijiro Wachi <[email protected]>
The current url.format implementation will return an invalid URL string without the host if there is a port and unicode: true. This unexpected behavior is caused by domainToUnicode, which expects a hostname instead of a host string according to node_url.cc. Adds both a fix and a test for the issue. PR-URL: #20493 Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Tiancheng "Timothy" Gu <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Daijiro Wachi <[email protected]>
The current url.format implementation will return an invalid URL string without the host if there is a port and
unicode: true
.This unexpected behavior is caused by domainToUnicode, which expects a hostname instead of a host string according to node_url.cc.
For example:
url.domainToUnicode('xn--3kq375bonc.com')
will be correctly converted into Chinese'搞事情.com'
, buturl.domainToUnicode('xn--3kq375bonc.com:80')
would produce an empty string.Code to reproduce
References
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passes