Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fix fs & util docs #18775

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Fix fs & util docs #18775

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

shqld
Copy link

@shqld shqld commented Feb 14, 2018 •
edited
Loading

Overview
  • Fixed typo in util.isDeepStrictEqual of doc/api/util.md.
  • Added missing return value specifications in doc/api/ fs.md & util.md.
Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)

doc

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. label Feb 14, 2018
@hiroppy hiroppy added util Issues and PRs related to the built-in util module. fs Issues and PRs related to the fs subsystem / file system. labels Feb 14, 2018
starkwang
starkwang approved these changes Feb 14, 2018
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@starkwang starkwang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@BridgeAR BridgeAR added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Feb 14, 2018
vsemozhetbyt
vsemozhetbyt reviewed Feb 14, 2018
View reviewed changes
doc/api/fs.md Outdated
@@ -1210,6 +1210,7 @@ changes:
* `start` {integer}
* `end` {integer}
* `highWaterMark` {integer}
* Returns: {ReadStream}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should be {stream.Readable}
See type-parser.js#L81-L84

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for your kind pointing out!

doc/api/fs.md Outdated
@@ -1285,6 +1286,7 @@ changes:
* `mode` {integer}
* `autoClose` {boolean}
* `start` {integer}
* Returns: {WriteStream}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should be {stream.Writable}
See type-parser.js#L81-L84

benjamingr
benjamingr requested changes Feb 14, 2018
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@benjamingr benjamingr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this, going to block so this doesn't land with ReadStream and WriteStream by mistake - looks good other than that

@shqld
Copy link
Author

shqld commented Feb 14, 2018 •
edited
Loading

@benjamingr @vsemozhetbyt I added a fixing commit about stream type name! Please confirm it 🙇

@shqld
Copy link
Author

shqld commented Feb 14, 2018 •
edited
Loading

By the way, I wonder that specifying like Returns: {undefined} (e.g. in this part) is a little confusing because other functions which return nothing doesn't have things like that.
Should we unify the formats?

benjamingr
benjamingr approved these changes Feb 14, 2018
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@benjamingr benjamingr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks for this

@vsemozhetbyt
Copy link
Contributor

vsemozhetbyt commented Feb 14, 2018 •
edited
Loading

CI-lite: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request-lite/170/

@lpinca
Copy link
Member

lpinca commented Feb 14, 2018

Should we unify the formats?

Yes, I think it makes sense.

@shqld
Copy link
Author

shqld commented Feb 15, 2018 •
edited
Loading

@lpinca Thanks! Then I'm gonna remove them. But there are 12 Returns: {undefined} in doc/ so should I do that in another PR or can I do here?

@lpinca
Copy link
Member

lpinca commented Feb 15, 2018

@shqld It's probably better to use a dedicated PR.

@shqld
Copy link
Author

shqld commented Feb 15, 2018

I see! 😄

BridgeAR pushed a commit to BridgeAR/node that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2018
@BridgeAR
doc: fix a typo in util.isDeepStrictEqual
ff471da 
PR-URL: nodejs#18775
Reviewed-By: Weijia Wang <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Roman Reiss <[email protected]>
BridgeAR pushed a commit to BridgeAR/node that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2018
@BridgeAR
doc: add missing Returns in fs & util
9a18b0e 
PR-URL: nodejs#18775
Reviewed-By: Weijia Wang <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Roman Reiss <[email protected]>
@BridgeAR
Copy link
Member

Landed in ff471da, 9a18b0e 🎉

@BridgeAR BridgeAR closed this Feb 16, 2018
@MylesBorins
Copy link
Contributor

Should this be backported to v9.x-staging? If yes please follow the guide and raise a backport PR, if not let me know or add the dont-land-on label.

@shqld shqld mentioned this pull request Feb 23, 2018
Closed
3 tasks
@shqld
Copy link
Author

shqld commented Feb 23, 2018

I think it should. I'll do that.

@shqld shqld mentioned this pull request Mar 4, 2018
Closed
3 tasks
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2018
@MylesBorins
doc: fix a typo in util.isDeepStrictEqual
4ecf5bb 
Backport-PR-URL: #19127
PR-URL: #18775
Reviewed-By: Weijia Wang <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Roman Reiss <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2018
@MylesBorins
doc: add missing Returns in fs & util
e42600f 
Backport-PR-URL: #19127
PR-URL: #18775
Reviewed-By: Weijia Wang <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Roman Reiss <[email protected]>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Mar 6, 2018
Merged
@targos targos added backported-to-v9.x and removed backport-requested-v9.x author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. labels Mar 24, 2018
MayaLekova pushed a commit to MayaLekova/node that referenced this pull request May 8, 2018
@MayaLekova
doc: fix a typo in util.isDeepStrictEqual
6b836ee 
PR-URL: nodejs#18775
Reviewed-By: Weijia Wang <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Roman Reiss <[email protected]>
MayaLekova pushed a commit to MayaLekova/node that referenced this pull request May 8, 2018
@MayaLekova
doc: add missing Returns in fs & util
95759fb 
PR-URL: nodejs#18775
Reviewed-By: Weijia Wang <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Roman Reiss <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@starkwang starkwang starkwang approved these changes

@vsemozhetbyt vsemozhetbyt vsemozhetbyt approved these changes

@BridgeAR BridgeAR BridgeAR approved these changes

@lpinca lpinca lpinca approved these changes

@benjamingr benjamingr benjamingr approved these changes

@daynin daynin daynin approved these changes

@jasnell jasnell jasnell approved these changes

@silverwind silverwind silverwind approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. fs Issues and PRs related to the fs subsystem / file system. util Issues and PRs related to the built-in util module.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.