-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: use countdown in test file #17874
Conversation
let requests = 0; | ||
let responses = 0; | ||
const requestCountdown = new Countdown(total, () => server.close()); | ||
const responsecountdown = new Countdown(total, () => checkFiles()); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is better to add a mustCall
for these two lines. For example:
new Countdown(total, common.mustCall(() => server.close()));
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@starkwang Thanks. Its done!!!
c812e06
to
caa9d25
Compare
If this commit is landed as it is, it will close the referenced issue (which I don't think is correct). |
const requestCountdown = new Countdown(total, common.mustCall(() => | ||
server.close() | ||
)); | ||
const responsecountdown = new Countdown(total, common.mustCall(() => |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you update this const
to be camelCase
please?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@apapirovski Done. Thanks!!
let requests = 0; | ||
let responses = 0; | ||
const requestCountdown = new Countdown(total, common.mustCall(() => | ||
server.close() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I could be wrong but I don't think we strictly need two separate countdowns in this test? We could just use the responseCountdown
and have the server.close()
be inside it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@apapirovski It works fine. Done.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM with @apapirovski's comments addressed.
caa9d25
to
7109991
Compare
Fixes: #17169 PR-URL: #17874 Fixes: #17169 Reviewed-By: Weijia Wang <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Landed in 166a2ce. Thanks for your contribution! 🥇 |
Fixes: #17169 PR-URL: #17874 Fixes: #17169 Reviewed-By: Weijia Wang <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Fixes: #17169 PR-URL: #17874 Fixes: #17169 Reviewed-By: Weijia Wang <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Fixes: #17169 PR-URL: #17874 Fixes: #17169 Reviewed-By: Weijia Wang <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Fixes: #17169 PR-URL: #17874 Fixes: #17169 Reviewed-By: Weijia Wang <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Fixes: #17169
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passesAffected core subsystem(s)