crypto: return CHECK_OK in VerifyCallback #13241
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
VerifyCallback returns 1 in two locations but CHECK_CERT_REVOKED in a third return statment. This commit suggests that CHECK_OK is used instead of 1. CHECK_OK is also used as the return value in CheckWhitelistedServerCert so it seems to be consitent change to make.
nodejs-github-bot
added
c++
bnoordhuis
approved these changes
May 27, 2017
|
OSX fail is a new flaky: #13252 |
refack
approved these changes
May 27, 2017
cjihrig
approved these changes
May 27, 2017
danbev
added a commit
to danbev/node
that referenced
this pull request
May 29, 2017
VerifyCallback returns 1 in two locations but CHECK_CERT_REVOKED in a third return statment. This commit suggests that CHECK_OK is used instead of 1. CHECK_OK is also used as the return value in CheckWhitelistedServerCert so it seems to be consitent change to make. PR-URL: nodejs#13241 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
|
Landed in b3fa3fc |
jasnell
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 29, 2017
VerifyCallback returns 1 in two locations but CHECK_CERT_REVOKED in a third return statment. This commit suggests that CHECK_OK is used instead of 1. CHECK_OK is also used as the return value in CheckWhitelistedServerCert so it seems to be consitent change to make. PR-URL: #13241 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
3 tasks
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 17, 2017
VerifyCallback returns 1 in two locations but CHECK_CERT_REVOKED in a third return statment. This commit suggests that CHECK_OK is used instead of 1. CHECK_OK is also used as the return value in CheckWhitelistedServerCert so it seems to be consitent change to make. PR-URL: #13241 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
VerifyCallback returns 1 in two locations but CHECK_CERT_REVOKED in a
third return statment. This commit suggests that CHECK_OK is used
instead of 1. CHECK_OK is also used as the return value in
CheckWhitelistedServerCert so it seems to be consitent change to make.
Checklist
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test(Windows) passesAffected core subsystem(s)
crypto