-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
tools,lib: enable strict equality lint rule #12446
Closed
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Enablie a lint rule to require `===` and `!==` instead of `==` and `!=` except in some well-defined cases: * comparing against `null` as a shorthand for also checking for `undefined` * comparing the result of `typeof` * comparing literal values In cases where `==` or `!=` are being used as optimizations, use an ESLint comment to disable the `eqeqeq` rule for that line explicitly. I rather like this because it's a signal that the usage is intentional and not a mistake.
nodejs-github-bot
added
dont-land-on-v4.x
lib / src
Issues and PRs related to general changes in the lib or src directory.
tools
Issues and PRs related to the tools directory.
whatwg-url
Issues and PRs related to the WHATWG URL implementation.
labels
Apr 16, 2017
benjamingr
approved these changes
Apr 16, 2017
addaleax
approved these changes
Apr 16, 2017
jseijas
approved these changes
Apr 16, 2017
gibfahn
approved these changes
Apr 16, 2017
lpinca
approved these changes
Apr 17, 2017
cjihrig
approved these changes
Apr 17, 2017
jasnell
approved these changes
Apr 17, 2017
jasnell
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 18, 2017
Enablie a lint rule to require `===` and `!==` instead of `==` and `!=` except in some well-defined cases: * comparing against `null` as a shorthand for also checking for `undefined` * comparing the result of `typeof` * comparing literal values In cases where `==` or `!=` are being used as optimizations, use an ESLint comment to disable the `eqeqeq` rule for that line explicitly. I rather like this because it's a signal that the usage is intentional and not a mistake. PR-URL: #12446 Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Landed in 096508d |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
lib / src
Issues and PRs related to general changes in the lib or src directory.
tools
Issues and PRs related to the tools directory.
whatwg-url
Issues and PRs related to the WHATWG URL implementation.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Enablie a lint rule to require
===
and!==
instead of==
and!=
except in some well-defined cases:
null
as a shorthand for also checking forundefined
typeof
In cases where
==
or!=
are being used as optimizations, use anESLint comment to disable the
eqeqeq
rule for that line explicitly. Irather like this because it's a signal that the usage is intentional and
not a mistake.
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passesAffected core subsystem(s)
tools lib