-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
lib: allow server.listen({ port: "1234" }) #1116
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ | ||
var common = require('../common'); | ||
var assert = require('assert'); | ||
var net = require('net'); | ||
|
||
function close() { this.close(); } | ||
net.Server().listen({ port: undefined }, close); | ||
net.Server().listen({ port: '' + common.PORT }, close); | ||
|
||
[ 'nan', | ||
-1, | ||
123.456, | ||
0x10000, | ||
1 / 0, | ||
-1 / 0, | ||
'+Infinity', | ||
'-Infinity' ].forEach(function(port) { | ||
assert.throws(function() { | ||
net.Server().listen({ port: port }, assert.fail); | ||
}, /port should be >= 0 and < 65536/i); | ||
}); | ||
|
||
[null, true, false].forEach(function(port) { | ||
assert.throws(function() { | ||
net.Server().listen({ port: port }, assert.fail); | ||
}, /invalid listen argument/i); | ||
}); |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@cjihrig What was the motivation for disallowing an empty string?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Empty string and strings of 1 or more spaces become 0 when the + operator is applied. Since we want to allow zero, I had to specifically check for that case.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay, that much I get. It's not really clear to me though why undefined is allowed (and interpreted as 0) but not a blank string.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@misterdjules and I had a fair amount of discussion about this.
undefined
is allowed because the argument is optional and needs a default value. The empty string means you are explicitly passing in an "incorrect" value. I actually wasn't the one to add the original checks. However, I moved the validation, so I sort of took ownership of it when the bug (port zero was no longer allowed) was reported against 0.12.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay, thanks for the explanation. It feels kind of quirky but I don't have a strong enough opinion to file a PR for it. :-)