test: change the equal() by strictEqual() #10027
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Improved test by using strictEqual instead of equal
imyller
added
the
code-and-learn
mscdex
added
the
events
cjihrig
approved these changes
Dec 5, 2016
jasnell
approved these changes
Dec 5, 2016
evanlucas
approved these changes
Dec 7, 2016
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM
CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/5288/
Thanks for the contribution! I'll land after CI run finishes.
|
Landed in ee8848d with an amended commit message. Thanks for the contribution and for participating in the Code and Learn session! |
evanlucas
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 7, 2016
Improved test by using strictEqual instead of equal. PR-URL: #10027 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <[email protected]>
addaleax
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2016
Improved test by using strictEqual instead of equal. PR-URL: #10027 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <[email protected]>
addaleax
pushed a commit
to addaleax/node
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2016
Improved test by using strictEqual instead of equal. PR-URL: nodejs#10027 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <[email protected]>
Merged
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 20, 2016
Improved test by using strictEqual instead of equal. PR-URL: #10027 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <[email protected]>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 21, 2016
Improved test by using strictEqual instead of equal. PR-URL: #10027 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <[email protected]>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 21, 2016
Improved test by using strictEqual instead of equal. PR-URL: #10027 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Checklist
make -j8 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test nosign(Windows) passesAffected core subsystem(s)
test
Description of change
Improved test by using strictEqual instead of equal