Intl: Consider deprecating Intl.v8BreakIterator

[jasnell]

@littledan has put forward a TC-39 proposal to introduce Intl.Segmenter as a standardized replacement for the V8 specific Intl.v8BreakIterator.

Currently in Node.js, Intl.v8BreakIterator only works if the full-icu data is being used. Attempting to create an instance of Intl.v8BreakIterator with the default small-icu with throw. That said, given the desire to replace it with a standardized alternative we should consider emitting a runtime deprecation warning when it is used.

/cc @srl295 @caridy @nodejs/ctc @nodejs/tc39

[srl295]

Makes sense… is there a need to deprecate something that's really v8 internal? So I'm +0.0 on this subject to rounding err!

[littledan]

I hope no one new starts using the deprecated API, but it's currently exposed to some Node users. I'd support a runtime deprecation warning but would be even happier if it were just deleted. I hope to remove it entirely from a future version of V8.

[srl295]

Deletion makes sense too. I'm +1 on principle just not sure about policy details.

Enviado desde nuestro iPhone.

El oct. 1, 2016, a las 12:35 PM, littledan [email protected] escribió:

I hope no one new starts using the deprecated API, but it's currently exposed to some Node users. I'd support a runtime deprecation warning but would be even happier if it were just deleted. I hope to remove it entirely from a future version of V8.

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

[jasnell]

We have to deprecate first in one major before we can remove in the next.

On Saturday, October 1, 2016, Steven R. Loomis [email protected]
wrote:

Deletion makes sense too. I'm +1 on principle just not sure about policy
details.

Enviado desde nuestro iPhone.

El oct. 1, 2016, a las 12:35 PM, littledan <[email protected]
javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> escribió:

I hope no one new starts using the deprecated API, but it's currently
exposed to some Node users. I'd support a runtime deprecation warning but
would be even happier if it were just deleted. I hope to remove it entirely
from a future version of V8.

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#8865 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAa2eeHBPMPPYSlP9a66MhHwOGTR76LPks5qvs4KgaJpZM4KLXGH
.

[srl295]

Makes sense

[caridy]

@srl295 I thought we had discussed this in the past, and agreed on throwing an error, at least that was my understanding. Anyhow, let's try to take action asap, to prevent a bigger problem later on.

[Fishrock123]

If there is a chance this will be removed before the next major we should deprecate in v7.

[jasnell]

I'm thinking we probably should. I'm not able to add the ctc-agenda label
at the moment. We would need ctc ok to land it in v7.

On Monday, October 3, 2016, Jeremiah Senkpiel [email protected]
wrote:

If there is a chance this will be removed before the next major we should
deprecate in v7.

—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#8865 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAa2ef5BMHzosnWYo6fyrDTuOeNRWNSuks5qwQgwgaJpZM4KLXGH
.

[targos]

Here is a PR adding the deprecation warning: #8908

[rvagg]

One real problem here is that if v8BreakIterator gets removed in a near-future version of V8 then it will increase the difficulty in upgrading V8 mid-major, we'll either have to polyfill/backfill in a patched version of V8 when we upgrade to avoid breakage or break for users who may be using it (do we really think folks will be using it?).

The problem here is the speculative nature of the problem here.

Intl.Segmenter is before TC39, but that could take many months, no?

and

@littledan:

I hope to remove it entirely from a future version of V8.

What timeframe might we be talking about? Would this depend on TC39? What if Intl.Segmenter doesn't get accepted by TC39? Will Intl.v8BreakIterator be removed regardless?

[rvagg]

Some discussion at CTC meeting, lots of uncertainty still, @littledan is on vacation for a few weeks apparently. This should come back on the agenda.

[rvagg]

@s3ththompson: "won't be deprecating it until Intl.Segmenter makes it in, but would be happy for Node to remove it to be forward-looking, particularly since it only impacts a subset of users."

[jasnell]

At the very least, adding the deprecation warning is the right thing to do
now just in case

On Wednesday, October 5, 2016, Rod Vagg [email protected] wrote:

@s3ththompson https://github.com/s3ththompson: "won't be deprecating it
until Intl.Segmenter makes it in, but would be happy for Node to remove it
to be forward-looking, particularly since it only impacts a subset of
users."

—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#8865 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAa2eQUvMJl8eBJ-mSqnpCro7GWzjbpvks5qxA0_gaJpZM4KLXGH
.

[littledan]

To give a little more context on top of what @s3ththompson, Intl.Segmenter will take at least six more months, and could be even longer (a year or two), but I'm optimistic that it'll eventually make it through standardization.

[AaronPresley]

Hi all,

I'm looking to integrate segmentation in some node (v10) code.

From what I understand after a twitter chat with @srl295, Intl.v8BreakIterator has been completely removed; however its replacement of Intl.Segmentation is still in Stage 3 and not yet approved.

How would you recommend I use these APIs in node? Am I just stuck with an older version that supports Intl.v8BreakIterator? Would appreciate some guidance.

Secondly, would also love to understand why this feature was completely removed before a suitable replacement was approved? Or am I misunderstanding something?

Thanks for your time.

[devsnek]

if you only need en-US, this should work. https://gist.github.com/inexorabletash/8c4d869a584bcaa18514729332300356

[AaronPresley]

@devsnek Unfortunately en-US is the least of my worries. Mostly working with CJK languages.

[srl295]

why this feature was completely removed before a suitable replacement was approved?

Because it wasn't actually a Node.js feature. It was an unsupported, lightly documented undocumented, non standard, internal function in v8. It tended to cause a process crash (#3111) rather than a graceful response to data loading or parameter errors.

A couple of other interim options which link against another copy of ICU4C might include: https://www.npmjs.com/package/node-icu-tokenizer or https://www.npmjs.com/package/icu-wordsplit — maybe these could be made to work with the new API.

[AaronPresley]

Because it wasn't actually a Node.js feature.

Ah, that makes sense then. Thanks for the explanation. That would also explain why it's been so impossible to find documentation for that function :)

[littledan]

It used to be documented in a Google Code repository, but that was removed when Google Code was shut down, and I'm not sure where to find it in the Internet Archive :(

[srl295]

@littledan My mistake! I updated my commend above with a link to the docs ☝️