Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tracking issue: stabilization of test runner code coverage #53924

Open
1 of 3 tasks
cjihrig opened this issue Jul 18, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
1 of 3 tasks

Tracking issue: stabilization of test runner code coverage #53924

cjihrig opened this issue Jul 18, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
coverage Issues and PRs related to native coverage support. feature request Issues that request new features to be added to Node.js. test_runner Issues and PRs related to the test runner subsystem.

Comments

@cjihrig
Copy link
Contributor

cjihrig commented Jul 18, 2024

What is the problem this feature will solve?

This issue is for tracking remaining work to stabilize code coverage in the test runner. When this feature originally shipped, it had documented limitations. Those have all been resolved.

Note that stabilization does not prevent future semver-minor additions or bug fixes.

Here is the minimum list of things that I think need to be resolved:

What is the feature you are proposing to solve the problem?

Eventually stabilizing test runner code coverage

What alternatives have you considered?

No response

@cjihrig cjihrig added the feature request Issues that request new features to be added to Node.js. label Jul 18, 2024
@cjihrig
Copy link
Contributor Author

cjihrig commented Jul 18, 2024

cc @MoLow @atlowChemi @benjamingr if you have other things to add to the list.

@RedYetiDev RedYetiDev added coverage Issues and PRs related to native coverage support. test_runner Issues and PRs related to the test runner subsystem. labels Jul 18, 2024
nodejs-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 22, 2024
This commit updates the test runner's code coverage so that
coverage options are explicitly passed in instead of pulled
from command line options.

PR-URL: #53931
Refs: #53924
Refs: #53867
Refs: #53866
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 28, 2024
This commit updates the test runner's code coverage so that
coverage options are explicitly passed in instead of pulled
from command line options.

PR-URL: #53931
Refs: #53924
Refs: #53867
Refs: #53866
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 5, 2024
This commit updates the test runner's code coverage so that
coverage options are explicitly passed in instead of pulled
from command line options.

PR-URL: #53931
Refs: #53924
Refs: #53867
Refs: #53866
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
coverage Issues and PRs related to native coverage support. feature request Issues that request new features to be added to Node.js. test_runner Issues and PRs related to the test runner subsystem.
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants