Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test_runner: warn if only is used without properly enabling only tests #46448

Closed
cjihrig opened this issue Jan 31, 2023 · 3 comments · Fixed by #46540
Closed

test_runner: warn if only is used without properly enabling only tests #46448

cjihrig opened this issue Jan 31, 2023 · 3 comments · Fixed by #46540
Labels
feature request Issues that request new features to be added to Node.js. test_runner Issues and PRs related to the test runner subsystem.

Comments

@cjihrig
Copy link
Contributor

cjihrig commented Jan 31, 2023

What is the problem this feature will solve?

only tests require enabling only mode, otherwise only does nothing. This can lead people to think that only does not work.

What is the feature you are proposing to solve the problem?

The test runner should warn if someone tries to use only without properly enabling it.

What alternatives have you considered?

Doing nothing.

@cjihrig cjihrig added feature request Issues that request new features to be added to Node.js. test_runner Issues and PRs related to the test runner subsystem. labels Jan 31, 2023
@richiemccoll
Copy link
Contributor

richiemccoll commented Feb 6, 2023

@cjihrig I can take a look at this one, if nobody else has picked it up.

  • Should this warning be a test diagnostic? or use a different mechanism for warnings?
  • Would this be emitted once per parent test, once per test file or something different?

@MoLow
Copy link
Member

MoLow commented Feb 6, 2023

@cjihrig I can take a look at this one, if nobody else has picked it up.

  • Should this warning be a test diagnostic? or use a different mechanism for warnings?
  • Would this be emitted once per parent test, once per test file or something different?

I think either process.emitWarning, or simply test.diagnostics is ok

@cjihrig
Copy link
Contributor Author

cjihrig commented Feb 7, 2023

I think we should prefer a test diagnostic.

nodejs-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 21, 2023
PR-URL: #46540
Fixes: #46448
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
MoLow pushed a commit to MoLow/node that referenced this issue Feb 25, 2023
PR-URL: nodejs#46540
Fixes: nodejs#46448
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
MoLow pushed a commit to MoLow/node that referenced this issue Feb 25, 2023
PR-URL: nodejs#46540
Fixes: nodejs#46448
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
MoLow pushed a commit to MoLow/node that referenced this issue Feb 25, 2023
PR-URL: nodejs#46540
Fixes: nodejs#46448
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
juanarbol pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 3, 2023
PR-URL: #46540
Backport-PR-URL: #46839
Fixes: #46448
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
juanarbol pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 5, 2023
PR-URL: #46540
Backport-PR-URL: #46839
Fixes: #46448
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 13, 2023
PR-URL: #46540
Fixes: #46448
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 14, 2023
PR-URL: #46540
Fixes: #46448
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature request Issues that request new features to be added to Node.js. test_runner Issues and PRs related to the test runner subsystem.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants
@cjihrig @MoLow @richiemccoll and others