Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tests: review and fix ineffective error tests #26385

Closed
ChALkeR opened this issue Mar 1, 2019 · 7 comments
Closed

tests: review and fix ineffective error tests #26385

ChALkeR opened this issue Mar 1, 2019 · 7 comments
Labels
good first issue Issues that are suitable for first-time contributors. help wanted Issues that need assistance from volunteers or PRs that need help to proceed. test Issues and PRs related to the tests.

Comments

@ChALkeR
Copy link
Member

ChALkeR commented Mar 1, 2019

See #26078 (review) for context.

After that, I looked up if we already have similar ineffective tests in our codebase, and I think that I found at least one.

E.g. using grep -r ' catch' test/ -A 2 | grep strictEqual, this one popped up half through the list:

readable.destroy(err);
try {
await readable[Symbol.asyncIterator]().next();
} catch (e) {
assert.strictEqual(e, err);
}
}

The code above doesn't test that the error is thrown (as it likely should), instead it tests that another error doesn't get thrown.

Note that there are a lot of false positives in the said grep (actually most matches are false positives), because e.g. this is perfectly fine:

try {
await evaluatePromise;
} catch (err) {
assert.strictEqual(m.error, err);
return;
}
assert.fail('Missing expected exception');

@ChALkeR ChALkeR added test Issues and PRs related to the tests. good first issue Issues that are suitable for first-time contributors. labels Mar 1, 2019
@ChALkeR
Copy link
Member Author

ChALkeR commented Mar 2, 2019

E.g. these are speculative (as the fact that they indeed throw is probably already tested elsewhere), but I would still like these to include a safeguard check:

try {
// Activate colors even if the tty does not support colors.
process.env.COLORTERM = '1';
assert.deepStrictEqual([1, 2, 2, 2], [2, 2, 2, 2]);
} catch (err) {
const expected = 'Expected values to be strictly deep-equal:\n' +
'\u001b[32m+ actual\u001b[39m \u001b[31m- expected\u001b[39m' +
' \u001b[34m...\u001b[39m Lines skipped\n\n' +
' [\n' +
'\u001b[32m+\u001b[39m 1,\n' +
'\u001b[31m-\u001b[39m 2,\n' +
' 2,\n' +
'\u001b[34m...\u001b[39m\n' +
' 2\n' +
' ]';
assert.strictEqual(err.message, expected);
}

try {
assert.deepStrictEqual({}, { foo: 'bar' });
} catch (error) {
const expected =
'Expected values to be strictly deep-equal:\n' +
'+ actual - expected\n' +
'\n' +
'+ {}\n' +
'- {\n' +
'- foo: \'bar\'\n' +
'- }';
assert.strictEqual(error.message, expected);
}

@ChALkeR
Copy link
Member Author

ChALkeR commented Mar 2, 2019

try {
require(`${loadOrder}file3`);
} catch (e) {
// Not a real .node module, but we know we require'd the right thing.
if (common.isOpenBSD) // OpenBSD errors with non-ELF object error
assert.ok(/File not an ELF object/.test(e.message.replace(backslash, '/')));
else
assert.ok(/file3\.node/.test(e.message.replace(backslash, '/')));
}
assert.strictEqual(require(`${loadOrder}file4`).file4, 'file4.reg');
assert.strictEqual(require(`${loadOrder}file5`).file5, 'file5.reg2');
assert.strictEqual(require(`${loadOrder}file6`).file6, 'file6/index.js');
try {
require(`${loadOrder}file7`);
} catch (e) {
if (common.isOpenBSD)
assert.ok(/File not an ELF object/.test(e.message.replace(backslash, '/')));
else
assert.ok(/file7\/index\.node/.test(e.message.replace(backslash, '/')));
}

Speculative:

try {
await import(file);
} catch (e) {
assert.strictEqual(error, e);
}

@ChALkeR
Copy link
Member Author

ChALkeR commented Mar 2, 2019

I will prepare a gist of potential entries to review.

@JungMinu JungMinu self-assigned this Mar 5, 2019
@shisama
Copy link
Contributor

shisama commented Mar 18, 2019

@JungMinu Are you working for this? I am going to work for this. If you already do, I want to avoid conflict.

@BridgeAR BridgeAR added the help wanted Issues that need assistance from volunteers or PRs that need help to proceed. label Mar 18, 2019
@JungMinu JungMinu removed their assignment Mar 25, 2019
@JungMinu
Copy link
Member

JungMinu commented Mar 25, 2019

@shisama go for it

@shisama
Copy link
Contributor

shisama commented Apr 9, 2019

using grep -r ' catch' test/ -A 2 | grep assert | awk '{print $1}' | uniq, I got the file list.

  • [ ] test/parallel/test-vm-module-errors.js
  • [ ] test/parallel/test-vm-context.js #L59
  • test/parallel/test-util-inspect.js #L548
  • [ ] test/parallel/test-fs-promises.js #L306
  • [ ] test/parallel/test-listen-fd-detached-inherit.js #L72
  • [ ] test/parallel/test-fs-copyfile.js #69
  • test/parallel/test-vm-codegen.js #L16
  • [ ] test/parallel/test-readline-interface.js #512
  • [ ] test/parallel/test-worker-message-port-move.js #L48
  • [ ] test/parallel/test-console.js #279
  • [ ] test/parallel/test-stream-readable-async-iterators.js #L358
  • [ ] test/parallel/test-repl-require.js #L37
  • test/parallel/test-assert.js #L302 #L312
  • [ ] test/parallel/test-vm-module-dynamic-import.js #L18 #L80
  • [ ] test/parallel/test-net-pipe-connect-errors.js #L50
  • [ ] test/parallel/test-assert-if-error.js #28 #83
  • [ ] test/parallel/test-fs-sync-fd-leak.js #67
  • [ ] test/parallel/test-fs-open.js #L33
  • [ ] test/parallel/test-fs-mkdir.js #L128 #L169
  • [ ] test/parallel/test-listen-fd-detached.js #L72
  • test/addons/non-node-context/test-make-buffer.js #L15
  • [ ] test/sequential/test-child-process-emfile.js #L52
  • test/sequential/test-module-loading.js #L205 #L218
  • [ ] test/sequential/test-child-process-execsync.js #L49
  • test/es-module/test-esm-error-cache.js #L23
  • [ ] test/node-api/test_async/test-uncaught.js #L9
  • [ ] test/fixtures/es-module-loaders/not-found-assert-loader.mjs #L14

Strikethrough indicates the file I don't think it includes the problem.

@rawad663
Copy link

E.g. these are speculative (as the fact that they indeed throw is probably already tested elsewhere), but I would still like these to include a safeguard check:
node/test/pseudo-tty/test-assert-colors.js

Lines 5 to 21 in 453ed05

try {
// Activate colors even if the tty does not support colors.
process.env.COLORTERM = '1';
assert.deepStrictEqual([1, 2, 2, 2], [2, 2, 2, 2]);
} catch (err) {
const expected = 'Expected values to be strictly deep-equal:\n' +
'\u001b[32m+ actual\u001b[39m \u001b[31m- expected\u001b[39m' +
' \u001b[34m...\u001b[39m Lines skipped\n\n' +
' [\n' +
'\u001b[32m+\u001b[39m 1,\n' +
'\u001b[31m-\u001b[39m 2,\n' +
' 2,\n' +
'\u001b[34m...\u001b[39m\n' +
' 2\n' +
' ]';
assert.strictEqual(err.message, expected);
}

node/test/pseudo-tty/test-assert-no-color.js

Lines 7 to 19 in 453ed05

try {
assert.deepStrictEqual({}, { foo: 'bar' });
} catch (error) {
const expected =
'Expected values to be strictly deep-equal:\n' +
'+ actual - expected\n' +
'\n' +
'+ {}\n' +
'- {\n' +
'- foo: 'bar'\n' +
'- }';
assert.strictEqual(error.message, expected);
}

Hey @ChALkeR I can work on adding a few safeguard checks for these tests!

@danbev danbev closed this as completed in fb3f600 Apr 24, 2019
targos pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 27, 2019
Fix tests whether errors are thrown correctly
because they are successful when error doesn't get thrown.

PR-URL: #27333
Fixes: #26385
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
good first issue Issues that are suitable for first-time contributors. help wanted Issues that need assistance from volunteers or PRs that need help to proceed. test Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants