Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

hit a wall trying to install io.js #2338

Closed
jmdyck opened this issue Aug 9, 2015 · 7 comments
Closed

hit a wall trying to install io.js #2338

jmdyck opened this issue Aug 9, 2015 · 7 comments
Labels
question Issues that look for answers.

Comments

@jmdyck
Copy link

jmdyck commented Aug 9, 2015

I went to iojs.org, clicked on "Download for Linux", got iojs-v3.0.0-linux-x64.tar.xz, unpacked it, opened the README.md. So far, so good. The build instructions for Unix are the usual "./configure; make; make install", which would be fine, except that the download's top-level directory doesn't have a 'configure' script or 'Makefile'. I don't know how to make sense of this.

@kenany
Copy link
Contributor

kenany commented Aug 9, 2015

@jmdyck I believe you've downloaded the pre-built binaries.

@r-52
Copy link
Contributor

r-52 commented Aug 9, 2015

Downloads on the website are binaries - they contain no plain js or C++ code. The bin folder should contain the executable iojs file. You could also download the repository from github and then self- compile it.

@Fishrock123 Fishrock123 added the question Issues that look for answers. label Aug 9, 2015
@jmdyck
Copy link
Author

jmdyck commented Aug 9, 2015

Okay, thanks, but then why does the README for a pre-built binary have build instructions?

@r-52
Copy link
Contributor

r-52 commented Aug 9, 2015

I believe the readme in the package is the default readme.md, so it has also build instructions. (Just in case that you are directly building it from source)

jmdyck added a commit to jmdyck/io.js that referenced this issue Aug 9, 2015
See issue nodejs#2338: the presence of Build instructions in my download confused me.

The wording probably isn't correct, but that's roughly the idea.
@jmdyck
Copy link
Author

jmdyck commented Aug 9, 2015

@romankl Hah, you said "Maybe it's worth a pr?" so I did, but now I see you removed that. Well, we'll see.

@r-52
Copy link
Contributor

r-52 commented Aug 10, 2015

Yea, was on mobile. My first thought was to maybe re-word the readme and a second that lead to the edit was that it's probably also possible to edit the tarball script, but that's something that I hadn't a chance to take a look at.

@Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor

Closing this, since it's mostly a question, PR is still open.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Issues that look for answers.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants