Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

test: flaky test/parallel/test-tracing-no-crash #22523

Closed
refack opened this issue Aug 25, 2018 · 0 comments
Closed

test: flaky test/parallel/test-tracing-no-crash #22523

refack opened this issue Aug 25, 2018 · 0 comments
Labels
flaky-test Issues and PRs related to the tests with unstable failures on the CI. test Issues and PRs related to the tests. trace_events Issues and PRs related to V8, Node.js core, and userspace code trace events.

Comments

@refack
Copy link
Contributor

refack commented Aug 25, 2018 •
edited
Loading

  • Version: master
  • Platform:
  • Subsystem: trace_events

Got a fail in test.parallel/test-tracing-no-crash when testing #22522 which refactors other tests.
So I'm assuming this is a flake.

[eval]:1
throw new Error()
^

Error
    at [eval]:1:7
    at Script.runInThisContext (vm.js:89:20)
    at Object.runInThisContext (vm.js:286:38)
    at Object.<anonymous> ([eval]-wrapper:6:22)
    at Module._compile (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:689:30)
    at evalScript (internal/bootstrap/node.js:607:27)
    at startup (internal/bootstrap/node.js:241:9)
    at bootstrapNodeJSCore (internal/bootstrap/node.js:727:3)
assert.js:84
  throw new AssertionError(obj);
  ^

AssertionError [ERR_ASSERTION]: Expected inputs to be strictly equal:
+ actual - expected

+ null
- 'SIGSEGV'
    at ChildProcess.CheckNoSignalAndErrorCodeOne (/data/iojs/build/workspace/node-test-commit-linuxone/nodes/rhel72-s390x/test/parallel/test-tracing-no-crash.js:7:10)
    at ChildProcess.<anonymous> (/data/iojs/build/workspace/node-test-commit-linuxone/nodes/rhel72-s390x/test/common/index.js:431:15)
    at ChildProcess.emit (events.js:182:13)
    at Process.ChildProcess._handle.onexit (internal/child_process.js:242:12)

https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-linuxone/nodes=rhel72-s390x/4414/
@refack refack added test Issues and PRs related to the tests. trace_events Issues and PRs related to V8, Node.js core, and userspace code trace events. flaky-test Issues and PRs related to the tests with unstable failures on the CI. labels Aug 25, 2018
addaleax added a commit to addaleax/node that referenced this issue Nov 6, 2018
@addaleax
tracing: fix static destruction order issue
14476ff 
Sometimes, the `parallel/test-tracing-no-crash` would not work as
expected, at least on Windows, because there is a static destruction
race between tearing down the `NodeTraceWriter` instance and the
per-process options struct. If the per-process options were destroyed
before the `NodeTraceWriter`, the reference to the tracing filename
would be gone before opening the file was attempted.

This can be solved by creating a copy of the string when creating the
`NodeTraceWriter` instance rather than taking a reference.

Fixes: nodejs#22523
@addaleax addaleax mentioned this issue Nov 6, 2018
Closed
3 tasks
BridgeAR pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 14, 2018
@addaleax @BridgeAR
tracing: fix static destruction order issue
8de1030 
Sometimes, the `parallel/test-tracing-no-crash` would not work as
expected, at least on Windows, because there is a static destruction
race between tearing down the `NodeTraceWriter` instance and the
per-process options struct. If the per-process options were destroyed
before the `NodeTraceWriter`, the reference to the tracing filename
would be gone before opening the file was attempted.

This can be solved by creating a copy of the string when creating the
`NodeTraceWriter` instance rather than taking a reference.

Fixes: #22523

PR-URL: #24123
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <[email protected]>
kiyomizumia pushed a commit to kiyomizumia/node that referenced this issue Nov 15, 2018
@addaleax @kiyomizumia
tracing: fix static destruction order issue
9513acf 
Sometimes, the `parallel/test-tracing-no-crash` would not work as
expected, at least on Windows, because there is a static destruction
race between tearing down the `NodeTraceWriter` instance and the
per-process options struct. If the per-process options were destroyed
before the `NodeTraceWriter`, the reference to the tracing filename
would be gone before opening the file was attempted.

This can be solved by creating a copy of the string when creating the
`NodeTraceWriter` instance rather than taking a reference.

Fixes: nodejs#22523

PR-URL: nodejs#24123
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <[email protected]>
codebytere pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 14, 2018
@addaleax @codebytere
tracing: fix static destruction order issue
5dec2ca 
Sometimes, the `parallel/test-tracing-no-crash` would not work as
expected, at least on Windows, because there is a static destruction
race between tearing down the `NodeTraceWriter` instance and the
per-process options struct. If the per-process options were destroyed
before the `NodeTraceWriter`, the reference to the tracing filename
would be gone before opening the file was attempted.

This can be solved by creating a copy of the string when creating the
`NodeTraceWriter` instance rather than taking a reference.

Fixes: #22523

PR-URL: #24123
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <[email protected]>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 26, 2018
@addaleax @MylesBorins
tracing: fix static destruction order issue
a1d7ed7 
Sometimes, the `parallel/test-tracing-no-crash` would not work as
expected, at least on Windows, because there is a static destruction
race between tearing down the `NodeTraceWriter` instance and the
per-process options struct. If the per-process options were destroyed
before the `NodeTraceWriter`, the reference to the tracing filename
would be gone before opening the file was attempted.

This can be solved by creating a copy of the string when creating the
`NodeTraceWriter` instance rather than taking a reference.

Fixes: #22523

PR-URL: #24123
Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
flaky-test Issues and PRs related to the tests with unstable failures on the CI. test Issues and PRs related to the tests. trace_events Issues and PRs related to V8, Node.js core, and userspace code trace events.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

tracing: fix static destruction order issue addaleax/node
1 participant
@refack