-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
stream: .read() when piping can stop the flow of data #18512
Labels
stream
Issues and PRs related to the stream subsystem.
Comments
This was referenced Feb 2, 2018
addaleax
added a commit
to addaleax/node
that referenced
this issue
Feb 6, 2018
The complicated `awaitDrain` machinery can be made a bit slimmer, and more correct, by just resetting the value each time `stream.emit('data')` is called. By resetting the value before emitting the data chunk, and seeing whether any pipe destinations return `.write() === false`, we always end up in a consistent state and don’t need to worry about odd situations (like `dest.write(chunk)` emitting more data). PR-URL: nodejs#18516 Fixes: nodejs#18484 Fixes: nodejs#18512 Refs: nodejs#18515 Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
addaleax
added a commit
to addaleax/node
that referenced
this issue
Feb 27, 2018
The complicated `awaitDrain` machinery can be made a bit slimmer, and more correct, by just resetting the value each time `stream.emit('data')` is called. By resetting the value before emitting the data chunk, and seeing whether any pipe destinations return `.write() === false`, we always end up in a consistent state and don’t need to worry about odd situations (like `dest.write(chunk)` emitting more data). PR-URL: nodejs#18516 Fixes: nodejs#18484 Fixes: nodejs#18512 Refs: nodejs#18515 Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
MayaLekova
pushed a commit
to MayaLekova/node
that referenced
this issue
May 8, 2018
The complicated `awaitDrain` machinery can be made a bit slimmer, and more correct, by just resetting the value each time `stream.emit('data')` is called. By resetting the value before emitting the data chunk, and seeing whether any pipe destinations return `.write() === false`, we always end up in a consistent state and don’t need to worry about odd situations (like `dest.write(chunk)` emitting more data). PR-URL: nodejs#18516 Fixes: nodejs#18484 Fixes: nodejs#18512 Refs: nodejs#18515 Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
This was referenced Mar 7, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Run the following test case, that produces an infinite stream that is piped to a simple writable stream. If you do a read in between when the destination's buffer is full, the pipe breaks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: