Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

stream: .read() when piping can stop the flow of data #18512

Closed
mafintosh opened this issue Feb 1, 2018 · 0 comments
Closed

stream: .read() when piping can stop the flow of data #18512

mafintosh opened this issue Feb 1, 2018 · 0 comments
Labels
stream Issues and PRs related to the stream subsystem.

Comments

@mafintosh
Copy link
Member

  • Version: >= 4
  • Platform: Linux
  • Subsystem: stream

Run the following test case, that produces an infinite stream that is piped to a simple writable stream. If you do a read in between when the destination's buffer is full, the pipe breaks.

var stream = require('stream')

var rs = stream.Readable({
  objectMode: true,
  read: () => rs.push({})
})

setImmediate(function () {
  rs.read()
})

var ws = stream.Writable({
  objectMode: true,
  write: (data, enc, cb) => {
    console.log(data)
    setTimeout(cb, 10)
  }
})

rs.pipe(ws)
@ChALkeR ChALkeR added the stream Issues and PRs related to the stream subsystem. label Feb 1, 2018
addaleax added a commit to addaleax/node that referenced this issue Feb 6, 2018
The complicated `awaitDrain` machinery can be made a bit
slimmer, and more correct, by just resetting the value
each time `stream.emit('data')` is called.

By resetting the value before emitting the data chunk, and
seeing whether any pipe destinations return `.write() === false`,
we always end up in a consistent state and don’t need to worry
about odd situations (like `dest.write(chunk)` emitting more data).

PR-URL: nodejs#18516
Fixes: nodejs#18484
Fixes: nodejs#18512
Refs: nodejs#18515
Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
addaleax added a commit to addaleax/node that referenced this issue Feb 27, 2018
The complicated `awaitDrain` machinery can be made a bit
slimmer, and more correct, by just resetting the value
each time `stream.emit('data')` is called.

By resetting the value before emitting the data chunk, and
seeing whether any pipe destinations return `.write() === false`,
we always end up in a consistent state and don’t need to worry
about odd situations (like `dest.write(chunk)` emitting more data).

PR-URL: nodejs#18516
Fixes: nodejs#18484
Fixes: nodejs#18512
Refs: nodejs#18515
Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
MayaLekova pushed a commit to MayaLekova/node that referenced this issue May 8, 2018
The complicated `awaitDrain` machinery can be made a bit
slimmer, and more correct, by just resetting the value
each time `stream.emit('data')` is called.

By resetting the value before emitting the data chunk, and
seeing whether any pipe destinations return `.write() === false`,
we always end up in a consistent state and don’t need to worry
about odd situations (like `dest.write(chunk)` emitting more data).

PR-URL: nodejs#18516
Fixes: nodejs#18484
Fixes: nodejs#18512
Refs: nodejs#18515
Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
stream Issues and PRs related to the stream subsystem.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants