This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 22, 2023. It is now read-only.
process: use uv_signal instead of ev_signal #3890
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
TBR by @isaacs, @bnoordhuis, @indutny or @TooTallNate |
|
After landing this we could possible remove the old |
Since libev is on it's way out, ev_signal will be removed, so switch to the libuv equivalent. As a bonus, this sort of works on Windows too.
| assert(args.IsConstructCall()); | ||
|
|
||
| HandleScope scope; | ||
| SignalWrap *wrap = new SignalWrap(args.This()); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah. I copied this from timer_wrap :-). Will change.
|
Couple of nits, otherwise LGTM. |
|
Landed in 600a646. |
richardlau
pushed a commit
to ibmruntimes/node
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 14, 2015
PR nodejs#3890 [1] introduced the variable ALLOW_INSECURE_SERVER_DHPARAM defined in src/node_crypto.cc. However, if nodejs is built without OpenSSL support, the build fails: error: ‘ALLOW_INSECURE_SERVER_DHPARAM’ was not declared in this scope ALLOW_INSECURE_SERVER_DHPARAM = true; Fix this by using the preprocessor macro HAVE_OPENSSL to opt-out the use of ALLOW_INSECURE_SERVER_DHPARAM in non-OpenSSL builds. [1] nodejs/node#3890 PR-URL: nodejs/node#4201 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <[email protected]>
richardlau
pushed a commit
to ibmruntimes/node
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 15, 2016
PR nodejs#3890 [1] introduced the variable ALLOW_INSECURE_SERVER_DHPARAM defined in src/node_crypto.cc. However, if nodejs is built without OpenSSL support, the build fails: error: ‘ALLOW_INSECURE_SERVER_DHPARAM’ was not declared in this scope ALLOW_INSECURE_SERVER_DHPARAM = true; Fix this by using the preprocessor macro HAVE_OPENSSL to opt-out the use of ALLOW_INSECURE_SERVER_DHPARAM in non-OpenSSL builds. [1] nodejs/node#3890 PR-URL: nodejs/node#4201 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <[email protected]>
jBarz
pushed a commit
to ibmruntimes/node
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 4, 2016
PR nodejs#3890 [1] introduced the variable ALLOW_INSECURE_SERVER_DHPARAM defined in src/node_crypto.cc. However, if nodejs is built without OpenSSL support, the build fails: error: ‘ALLOW_INSECURE_SERVER_DHPARAM’ was not declared in this scope ALLOW_INSECURE_SERVER_DHPARAM = true; Fix this by using the preprocessor macro HAVE_OPENSSL to opt-out the use of ALLOW_INSECURE_SERVER_DHPARAM in non-OpenSSL builds. [1] nodejs/node#3890 PR-URL: nodejs/node#4201 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Since libev is on it's way out, ev_signal will be removed, so switch to
the libuv equivalent. As a bonus, this sort of works on Windows too.