-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 66
ep: ws in core #6
ep: ws in core #6
Conversation
003-ws-in-core.md
Outdated
|
||
> `websockets` are the primary reason for companies, which have **not** decided | ||
to make a commitment towards `node` to use `node` anyways. For a wider adoption | ||
of the language this is a critical point. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How much basis is there for this? My insight indicates to me: little to none..
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
...me as an engineering manager in a PHP-shop.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could change wording, but I think this fact still hold up.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I highly doubt that this is a valid point. Without performing some kind of relevant research, at least.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If companies are already adopting node.js because of how good the ws
package is, then that means the ws
maintainers are doing a great job and there's nothing that node core needs to do.
@eljefedelrodeodeljefe Now that v8_inspector has landed, with basic ws support, may want to revise this proposal. |
The most recent discussion is happening in nodejs/node#19308 |
Superseded by nodejs/node#19308 |
EP as on nodejs/node#4842