-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 119
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Wrong inline ARM Jenkins status on node PRs #108
Comments
Seeing this in the logs related to PR 10342 and ARM: 19:05:25.868Z INFO bot: Jenkins / Github PR status updated (req_id=d37fa1da-7246-4b88-bb8e-759d9d14be56, pr=10342, job=test/arm-fanned, status=pending)
19:05:38.608Z INFO bot: Jenkins / Github PR status updated (req_id=f5b4cc52-097c-4026-a6aa-406bf0531197, pr=10342, job=test/arm, status=pending)
19:05:49.808Z INFO bot: Jenkins / Github PR status updated (req_id=fbd97ff0-81a9-4d6e-91d4-a9519a490b66, pr=10342, job=test/arm, status=pending)
19:05:55.256Z INFO bot: Jenkins / Github PR status updated (req_id=ab6678d5-2c40-4743-a1da-6cacb646f8a4, pr=10342, job=test/arm, status=pending)
19:30:23.187Z INFO bot: Jenkins / Github PR status updated (req_id=5bd9d410-b387-422f-87ec-650a37982605, pr=10342, job=test/arm-fanned, status=success)
19:43:45.646Z INFO bot: Jenkins / Github PR status updated (req_id=d97e6bfd-d6f8-44ad-bdca-981fa8f545aa, pr=10342, job=test/arm, status=success)
19:43:45.790Z INFO bot: Jenkins / Github PR status updated (req_id=efead0d0-1155-4327-83fe-db966500ac3b, pr=10342, job=test/arm, status=failure) From the looks of that, it's Jenkins pushing a failure status. |
I've done some changes to both arm-fanned and arm. I think it might be related to the matrix type of job holds thumbs. |
@jbergstroem to clearify, you did some changes supposed to fix these issues? Or had you done some changes previously which might have caused this issues in the first place? Still seeing this in new PRs: nodejs/node#10524 which says https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-arm/6788/ failed when it didn't. |
(I think) related: nodejs/build#572 |
The changes I did definitely didn't make things worse, but the issue still persists :( |
Any updates here? Kinda sad to see this happening for most PRs, I assume it adds some doubts about whether or not these statuses are correct at all.. |
I've looked several times. Can't find whats wrong. Happy to share access but I think you already have it? |
@jbergstroem I'd expect a "Configure"-link or something similar in the menu to the left if I had access? |
It's only people in @nodejs/jenkins-admins who can see it right? |
Is anyone actively working on this? Seems to have become one of those perma-ignore things for a lot of people in the main repo, which isn't healthy... :-( Not even sure who to loop in... @nodejs/build maybe? @Fishrock123 maybe? |
cc/ @nodejs/jenkins-admins |
This is mainly done to debug the current ARM issues we're seeing. Refs nodejs#108
Have to admint I haven't remembered to look into this I'm afraid. But by looking at the latest PRs and their inline status, it might look like failing ARM builds aren't as frequent anymore. @Trott would you agree? |
I think someone went in and fixed the ARM reporting, I want to say it was @joaocgreis but I could well be misremembering. |
Have a faint memory @joaocgreis fixed it as well. |
Honestly, I haven't been paying attention to it! Will try to do so over the next few hours/days. |
I fixed this. This issue looks like a duplicate of nodejs/build#572. I don't have permissions, but I think this can be closed now. |
Closing per @joaocgreis comment. |
This reverts commit ad4f572 which was added to give more debugging info of failing ARM builds. That has been fixed: #108 (comment)
There seems to be something fishy with the inline PR statuses forwarded from Jenkins. Looking at a few PRs which seem to have the same issue, it may be isolated to ARM builds.
These three PRs has inline ARM failure but Jenkins says they're green:
@jbergstroem you see anything suspicious with how the ARM builds are configured by any chance?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: