Let there be governance

CONTRIBUTING.md

@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+## Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.0
+
+By making a contribution to this project, I certify that:
+
+* (a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I
+  have the right to submit it under the open source license indicated
+  in the file; or
+* (b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best
+  of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source license
+  and I have the right under that license to submit that work with
+  modifications, whether created in whole or in part by me, under the
+  same open source license (unless I am permitted to submit under a
+  different license), as indicated in the file; or
+* (c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other
+  person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified it.
+
+
+## Code of Conduct
+
+This Code of Conduct is adapted from [Rust's wonderful
+CoC](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/wiki/Note-development-policy#conduct).
+
+* We are committed to providing a friendly, safe and welcoming
+  environment for all, regardless of gender, sexual orientation,
+  disability, ethnicity, religion, or similar personal characteristic.
+* Please avoid using overtly sexual nicknames or other nicknames that
+  might detract from a friendly, safe and welcoming environment for
+  all.
+* Please be kind and courteous. There's no need to be mean or rude.
+* Respect that people have differences of opinion and that every
+  design or implementation choice carries a trade-off and numerous
+  costs. There is seldom a right answer.
+* Please keep unstructured critique to a minimum. If you have solid
+  ideas you want to experiment with, make a fork and see how it works.
+* We will exclude you from interaction if you insult, demean or harass
+  anyone.  That is not welcome behaviour. We interpret the term
+  "harassment" as including the definition in the [Citizen Code of
+  Conduct](http://citizencodeofconduct.org/); if you have any lack of
+  clarity about what might be included in that concept, please read
+  their definition. In particular, we don't tolerate behavior that
+  excludes people in socially marginalized groups.
+* Private harassment is also unacceptable. No matter who you are, if
+  you feel you have been or are being harassed or made uncomfortable
+  by a community member, please contact one of the channel ops or any
+  of the TC members immediately with a capture (log, photo, email) of
+  the harassment if possible.  Whether you're a regular contributor or
+  a newcomer, we care about making this community a safe place for you
+  and we've got your back.
+* Likewise any spamming, trolling, flaming, baiting or other
+  attention-stealing behaviour is not welcome.
+* Avoid the use of personal pronouns in code comments or
+  documentation. There is no need to address persons when explaining
+  code (e.g. "When the developer")

GOVERNANCE.md

@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
+### io.js Build Team Working Group
+
+The io.js build team is jointly governed by a Working Group (WG)
+which is responsible for high-level guidance of the project.
+
+The WG has final authority over this project including:
+
+* Technical direction
+* Project governance and process (including this policy)
+* Contribution policy
+* GitHub repository hosting
+* Conduct guidelines
+* Maintaining the list of additional Collaborators
+
+For the current list of WG members, see the project
+[README.md](./README.md#current-project-team-members).
+
+### Collaborators
+
+The [iojs/build](https://github.com/iojs/build),
+[iojs/docker-iojs](https://github.com/iojs/docker-iojs), and the
+[iojs/build-containers](https://github.com/iojs/build-containers)
+GitHub repositories are maintained by the WG and additional Collaborators
+who are added by the WG on an ongoing basis.
+
+Individuals making significant and valuable contributions are made
+Collaborators and given commit-access to the project. These
+individuals are identified by the WG and their addition as
+Collaborators is discussed during the weekly WG meeting.
+
+_Note:_ If you make a significant contribution and are not considered
+for commit-access log an issue or contact a WG member directly and it
+will be brought up in the next WG meeting.
+
+Modifications of the contents of the iojs/website repository are made on
+a collaborative basis. Anybody with a GitHub account may propose a
+modification via pull request and it will be considered by the project
+Collaborators. All pull requests must be reviewed and accepted by a
+Collaborator with sufficient expertise who is able to take full
+responsibility for the change. In the case of pull requests proposed
+by an existing Collaborator, an additional Collaborator is required
+for sign-off. Consensus should be sought if additional Collaborators
+participate and there is disagreement around a particular
+modification. See _Consensus Seeking Process_ below for further detail
+on the consensus model used for governance.
+
+Collaborators may opt to elevate significant or controversial
+modifications, or modifications that have not found consensus to the
+WG for discussion by assigning the ***WG-agenda*** tag to a pull
+request or issue. The WG should serve as the final arbiter where
+required.
+
+For the current list of Collaborators, see the project
+[README.md](./README.md#current-project-team-members).
+
+### WG Membership
+
+WG seats are not time-limited.  There is no fixed size of the WG.
+However, the expected target is between 6 and 12, to ensure adequate
+coverage of important areas of expertise, balanced with the ability to
+make decisions efficiently.
+
+There is no specific set of requirements or qualifications for WG
+membership beyond these rules.
+
+The WG may add additional members to the WG by unanimous consensus.
+
+A WG member may be removed from the WG by voluntary resignation, or by
+unanimous consensus of all other WG members.
+
+Changes to WG membership should be posted in the agenda, and may be
+suggested as any other agenda item (see "WG Meetings" below).
+
+If an addition or removal is proposed during a meeting, and the full
+WG is not in attendance to participate, then the addition or removal
+is added to the agenda for the subsequent meeting.  This is to ensure
+that all members are given the opportunity to participate in all
+membership decisions.  If a WG member is unable to attend a meeting
+where a planned membership decision is being made, then their consent
+is assumed.
+
+No more than 1/3 of the WG members may be affiliated with the same
+employer.  If removal or resignation of a WG member, or a change of
+employment by a WG member, creates a situation where more than 1/3 of
+the WG membership shares an employer, then the situation must be
+immediately remedied by the resignation or removal of one or more WG
+members affiliated with the over-represented employer(s).
+
+### WG Meetings
+
+The WG meets weekly on a Google Hangout On Air. The meeting is run by
+a designated moderator approved by the WG. Each meeting should be
+published to YouTube.
+
+Items are added to the WG agenda which are considered contentious or
+are modifications of governance, contribution policy, WG membership,
+or release process.
+
+The intention of the agenda is not to approve or review all patches,
+that should happen continuously on GitHub and be handled by the larger
+group of Collaborators.
+
+Any community member or contributor can ask that something be added to
+the next meeting's agenda by logging a GitHub Issue. Any Collaborator,
+WG member or the moderator can add the item to the agenda by adding
+the ***WG-agenda*** tag to the issue.
+
+Prior to each WG meeting the moderator will share the Agenda with
+members of the WG. WG members can add any items they like to the
+agenda at the beginning of each meeting. The moderator and the WG
+cannot veto or remove items.
+
+The WG may invite persons or representatives from certain projects to
+participate in a non-voting capacity.
+
+The moderator is responsible for summarizing the discussion of each
+agenda item and send it as a pull request after the meeting.
+
+### Consensus Seeking Process
+
+The WG follows a
+[Consensus Seeking](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consensus-seeking_decision-making)
+decision making model.
+
+When an agenda item has appeared to reach a consensus the moderator
+will ask "Does anyone object?" as a final call for dissent from the
+consensus.
+
+If an agenda item cannot reach a consensus a WG member can call for
+either a closing vote or a vote to table the issue to the next
+meeting. The call for a vote must be seconded by a majority of the WG
+or else the discussion will continue. Simple majority wins.
+
+Note that changes to WG membership require unanimous consensus.  See
+"WG Membership" above.