Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Build WG meeting 2017-10-24 22:00 pm UTC #939

Closed
gibfahn opened this issue Oct 24, 2017 · 12 comments
Closed

Build WG meeting 2017-10-24 22:00 pm UTC #939

gibfahn opened this issue Oct 24, 2017 · 12 comments

Comments

@gibfahn
Copy link
Member

gibfahn commented Oct 24, 2017

When

Oct 24, 2017 22:00 UTC - time in your timezone

Where

Agenda

Extracted from wg-agenda issues
and pull requests from this repo.

  • suggestion: investigate a commit-queue solution #705
  • tmp dir needed on ubuntu 1604 and fedora23 #873
  • assert node can be compiled as static / dynamic libraries #879
  • Have Rod walk rest of build team through Cloudflare setup #915
  • doc: update intel text in providers list (meta: negotiating wording for donor descriptions & contributions) #912
  • ansible: use gcc 4.9 on CentOS 6 #809
  • Make it easier for people to join the Build WG #941

All welcome of course, primarily @nodejs/build focused but we're happy to expand.

Please 👍 if you can make the meeting, and 👎 if you cannot.

@refack
Copy link
Contributor

refack commented Oct 24, 2017

Could we talk a bit the option of adding people to the WG without direct ssh access, but more geared towards helping the Automating SIG? (Also about having some DevOps sandbox machines, and even a sandbox Jenkins)?

@gibfahn
Copy link
Member Author

gibfahn commented Oct 24, 2017

@refack will raise issue.

@gibfahn
Copy link
Member Author

gibfahn commented Oct 24, 2017

@joyeecheung and @maclover7, as prospective members it'd be great if you could attend, assuming you have time. I know it's a bit last minute.

We should probably extend the invitation to anyone in nodejs/automation who's willing (join if you'd like). However I'd like to make sure everyone in build is okay with that before inviting, so we can discuss at this meeting and plan for next time if no objections.

@refack
Copy link
Contributor

refack commented Oct 24, 2017

We should probably extend the invitation to anyone in nodejs/automation who's willing (join if you'd like). However I'd like to make sure everyone in build is okay with that before inviting, so we can discuss at this meeting and plan for next time if no objections.

IMHO we should first talk in the current format about changing the format...

@rvagg
Copy link
Member

rvagg commented Oct 24, 2017

@nodejs/automation ping, anyone's welcome to join this meeting in ~45 mins and we can discuss how Build can best support Automation efforts and what an optimal relationship might be between the two groups.

@rvagg
Copy link
Member

rvagg commented Oct 24, 2017

I might be late to this, I have a quick but important meeting scheduled shortly beforehand

@evenstensberg
Copy link

@rvagg Could I get an invite?

@gibfahn
Copy link
Member Author

gibfahn commented Oct 24, 2017

@ev1stensberg someone should post a link to the hangout a couple of minutes before it starts.

Speaking of which, @mhdawson are you hosting today?

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member

@maclover7
Copy link
Contributor

not sure if meeting has started yet, but is not streaming on youtube

@refack
Copy link
Contributor

refack commented Oct 24, 2017

We're "cat herding"

@refack
Copy link
Contributor

refack commented Oct 24, 2017

on now

gibfahn added a commit to gibfahn/build that referenced this issue Oct 24, 2017
gibfahn added a commit to gibfahn/build that referenced this issue Oct 25, 2017
gibfahn added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 27, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants