Skip to content

Conversation

@mcollina
Copy link
Member

This change updates the escalation path from an 8-year-old process defined in the Node.js Foundation era to what was agreed to when the OpenJS Foundation was established. We should have done it long ago, but we forgot to update this one.

I took the occasion to remove the moderation-review label and directly upstream the problem of escalation to the OpenJS CoC Team. Alternatively, we could have an internal appeal process plus the OpenJS appeal process.

I've also changed the verbiage to have the TSC self-moderate.

The current set of documents from OpenJS can be found at https://github.com/openjs-foundation/cross-project-council/blob/main/conduct/COC_POLICY.md#escalation.

@mcollina
Copy link
Member Author

cc @nodejs/tsc

Copy link
Member

@jasnell jasnell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One small suggestion. Otherwise LGTM

Co-authored-by: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
@mcollina
Copy link
Member Author

Adjusted to follow @tobie clarification in #990 (comment).

Signed-off-by: Matteo Collina <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Matteo Collina <[email protected]>
@mcollina
Copy link
Member Author

I think this is ready. Please review.

@tobie
Copy link

tobie commented Jul 30, 2025

LGTM

Copy link
Member

@joyeecheung joyeecheung left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thanks for opening openjs-foundation/cross-project-council#1522 - I think that captures what I noticed very well.

@mcollina mcollina merged commit 1858c67 into main Jul 30, 2025
2 checks passed
@mcollina mcollina deleted the update-the-moderation-policy-to-openjs-escalation-path branch July 30, 2025 12:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants