Skip to content

stylix: point nixpkgs input to more conventional nixos-unstable ref#712

Merged
trueNAHO merged 1 commit intonix-community:masterfrom
trueNAHO:stylix-point-nixpkgs-input-to-more-conventional-nixos-unstable-ref
Jan 2, 2025
Merged

stylix: point nixpkgs input to more conventional nixos-unstable ref#712
trueNAHO merged 1 commit intonix-community:masterfrom
trueNAHO:stylix-point-nixpkgs-input-to-more-conventional-nixos-unstable-ref

Conversation

@trueNAHO
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Update the nixpkgs ref, following the conversation from:

Keep in mind that the Nixpkgs PR has to land into nixpkgs-unstable (https://nixpk.gs/pr-tracker.html?pr=368404) because that is what we are tracking:

https://github.com/danth/stylix/blob/963e77a3a4fc2be670d5a9a6cbeb249b8a43808a/flake.nix#L45

The package PR has landed onto nixpkgs-unstable, but we gotta wait for the HM merge. I guess they wait for nixos-unstable:

https://github.com/nix-community/home-manager/blob/10e99c43cdf4a0713b4e81d90691d22c6a58bdf2/flake.nix#L4

Is there a reason why nixos-unstable isn't tracked in stylix?

-- arunoruto, "ghostty: init"

@trueNAHO trueNAHO enabled auto-merge (squash) December 31, 2024 17:01
@trueNAHO trueNAHO requested a review from danth December 31, 2024 17:01
@trueNAHO trueNAHO mentioned this pull request Dec 31, 2024
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@danth danth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense to track the same branch as Home Manager.

@trueNAHO trueNAHO merged commit 90f95c5 into nix-community:master Jan 2, 2025
trueNAHO added a commit to danth/stylix-fork that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2025
Match nixpkgs and dev-nixpkgs input references, aligning with commit
90f95c5 ("stylix: point nixpkgs input to more conventional
nixos-unstable ref (nix-community#712)").

Fixes: a5c1532 ("flake: partition dev inputs (nix-community#1289)")
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants