Skip to content

gnome: update to GNOME 49#1966

Merged
danth merged 4 commits intonix-community:masterfrom
vidhanio:gnome-49
Nov 15, 2025
Merged

gnome: update to GNOME 49#1966
danth merged 4 commits intonix-community:masterfrom
vidhanio:gnome-49

Conversation

@vidhanio
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@vidhanio vidhanio commented Nov 14, 2025

Update both .patch files for GNOME 49.


This is required to have GNOME 49 in the testbed - as otherwise our
patches will be incompatible.
@stylix-automation stylix-automation bot added topic: dependencies Dependency updates topic: flake /flake.nix, /flake.lock, and /flake/ subsystems labels Nov 15, 2025
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@danth danth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

I pushed some extra commits to also update our GNOME flake input, and update the sass variables we pass into the theme to match the changes upstream.

@danth danth changed the title gnome: update patches for 49 gnome: update to GNOME 49 Nov 15, 2025
@danth danth merged commit 29dc3dd into nix-community:master Nov 15, 2025
8 of 12 checks passed
@trueNAHO trueNAHO mentioned this pull request Nov 16, 2025
6 tasks
@trueNAHO
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Unlike the space related CI failures from #1961, commit efd8045 ("flake: update nixpkgs input") from this PR definitely breaks CI because it does not address the upstream NixOS/nixpkgs#457713 rename that is already pending in #1961.

@danth
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

danth commented Nov 17, 2025

Unlike the space related CI failures from #1961, commit efd8045 ("flake: update nixpkgs input") from this PR definitely breaks CI because it does not address the upstream NixOS/nixpkgs#457713 rename that is already pending in #1961.

Apologies, missed this since CI was not working properly.

@trueNAHO
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Unlike the space related CI failures from #1961, commit efd8045 ("flake: update nixpkgs input") from this PR definitely breaks CI because it does not address the upstream NixOS/nixpkgs#457713 rename that is already pending in #1961.

Apologies, missed this since CI was not working properly.

No worries.

#1968 should fix commit efd8045 ("flake: update nixpkgs input") and #1970 potentially prevents future problems. With #1969, CI should be passing again.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

topic: dependencies Dependency updates topic: flake /flake.nix, /flake.lock, and /flake/ subsystems topic: modules /modules/ subsystem

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

gnome: shell_remove_dark_mode.patch fails to apply on latest gnome version in nixpkgs

3 participants