-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
borgmatic: Allow top-level extra options #3793
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It may be a bit unfortunate that this doesn't do a recursive update so
consistency.extraConfig = …
would give a different result compared toextraConfig.consistency = …
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it is a very good point. Would you mind giving me a clue on how to implement that please?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
after discussing on Matrix, we decided to:
extraConfig
options and only keep the top-level onemkRenamedOptionModule
to warn the user about the deprecated APIUnfortunately, I've been unable to make it work. I pushed a WIP commit to show my latest try. Can someone please help?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The latest issue I have is
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The immediate problem is that you're defining
imports
insideoptions
, but it should be at the same level asconfig
andoptions
.The real problem is that these
mkRemovedOptionModule
s will not work because of NixOS/nixpkgs#96006. The most promising attempt to fix that is currently NixOS/nixpkgs#207187.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If I understand what @ncfavier just said, it seems impossible to deprecate the non-top-level
extraConfig
options for now. Having both a top-levelextraConfig
option and having non-top-level ones is messy.The only solution I see is to have no top-level
extraConfig
option. As a result, I suggest we introduce a top-level option for each of borgmatic's setting sections and add oneextraConfig
for each. If I'm not mistaken after reading the example configuration file, this just means addingoutput
andhooks
top-level options.What do you think @ncfavier and @rycee?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I implemented this approach in #4108.