Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency ts-jest to v29.2.2 #815

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 15, 2024

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jun 1, 2024

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
ts-jest (source) 29.1.2 -> 29.2.2 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

kulshekhar/ts-jest (ts-jest)

v29.2.2

Compare Source

v29.2.1

Compare Source

v29.2.0

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • fix: don't show warning message with Node16/NodeNext (99c4f49), closes #​4266
Features
  • feat(cli): allow migrating cjs presets to transform config (22fb027)
  • feat(presets): add util functions to create ESM presets (06f78ed)
  • feat(presets): add util functions to create CJS presets (f9cc3c0)
Code refactoring
  • refactor: replace lodash deps with native js implementation (40f1708)
  • refactor: use TsJestTransformerOptions type everywhere possibly (7d001be)
  • refactor(cli): use new preset util functions to initialize test config (c2b56ca)
  • refactor(presets): use create preset util functions for cjs presets (922d6d0)
  • test: switch react-app to use Vite (827c8ad)

v29.1.5

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v29.1.4

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
Features

v29.1.3

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • add @jest/transform as an optional peer dependency (0ba7f86)
  • bring back Node 14 support (eda56a7)
Performance Improvements
  • remove ts resolved module cache file (4c88da5)

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am on the first day of the month" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 1, 2024

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9880487940

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 93.577%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 9138682713: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 1019
Relevant Lines: 1085

💛 - Coveralls

@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency ts-jest to v29.1.4 chore(deps): update dependency ts-jest to v29.1.5 Jun 16, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/ts-jest-29.x-lockfile branch from d2ddb0c to 684c3d8 Compare June 16, 2024 18:02
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency ts-jest to v29.1.5 chore(deps): update dependency ts-jest to v29.2.0 Jul 8, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/ts-jest-29.x-lockfile branch 2 times, most recently from 0c4eef0 to 6e06e7f Compare July 10, 2024 09:48
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency ts-jest to v29.2.0 chore(deps): update dependency ts-jest to v29.2.1 Jul 10, 2024
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency ts-jest to v29.2.1 chore(deps): update dependency ts-jest to v29.2.2 Jul 10, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/ts-jest-29.x-lockfile branch from 6e06e7f to 8de0fb4 Compare July 10, 2024 19:46
@ninoseki ninoseki merged commit f66869c into master Jul 15, 2024
4 checks passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/ts-jest-29.x-lockfile branch July 15, 2024 07:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants