Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow newer versions of Faraday #5

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 8, 2017
Merged

Allow newer versions of Faraday #5

merged 2 commits into from
May 8, 2017

Conversation

wa0x6e
Copy link
Contributor

@wa0x6e wa0x6e commented May 6, 2017

Current faraday (0.9.x) is locked to a version more than 1 year old, newest version is 0.12.x.

From their changelog, 0.10 and up introduce only one breaking change: removal of ruby 1.8.x support. Seems like cloudflair is not supporting that version anyway, so updating the faraday version should not break anything.

@cimnine
Copy link
Contributor

cimnine commented May 8, 2017

Thank you for your PR! Is there a reason why you limit the version to < 0.13?

@wa0x6e
Copy link
Contributor Author

wa0x6e commented May 8, 2017

v 0.13 (not released yet) shouldn't introduce breaking changes, but better be safe than sorry. I can edit that to < 0.2

@cimnine
Copy link
Contributor

cimnine commented May 8, 2017

No, then it's probably all right. As [per their current CONTRIBUTING.md], they do not yet fully honor SemVer, because they haven't yet reached 1.0.0. So breaking changes are still accepted without incrementing the major version. That justifies the limitation to < 0.13 enough.

@cimnine cimnine merged commit 164146e into ninech:master May 8, 2017
@cimnine
Copy link
Contributor

cimnine commented May 8, 2017

A new version has been released, v0.1.0. Thanks again!

cimnine added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 21, 2017
Faraday version is controlled very tightly because breaking changes may be
introduced with any minor version until Faraday reaches 1.0.0. This has
was discussed in #5.

Fixes #6, #7
@cimnine cimnine mentioned this pull request Aug 21, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants