Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fix typo in line 456 #20047

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 16, 2022
Merged

Fix typo in line 456 #20047

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion doc/intern.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -454,7 +454,7 @@ could stem from a complex expression:
A thunk would need to call 'returnsDefaultCC[i]' somehow and that would require
an *additional* closure generation... Ok, not really, but it requires to pass
the function to call. So we'd end up with 2 indirect calls instead of one.
Another much more severe problem which this solution is that it's not GC-safe
Another much more severe problem with this solution is that it's not GC-safe
to pass a proc pointer around via a generic `ref` type.


Expand Down