Update host toolchain#682
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Owner
|
merged, thank you! should I rebuild gcc-14.2.0 build again as |
Contributor
Author
No, it's not necessary. |
rust-bors Bot
pushed a commit
to rust-lang/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 17, 2026
Before mingw-w64/mingw-w64@dbfdf80 mkstemp used by Binutils was not sufficiently collision resilient and that led to CI errors for us. Our new baseline mingw-w64 toolchain's Binutils are built using mingw-w64 with the fix: niXman/mingw-builds#682 So, we should be able to get rid of it.
JonathanBrouwer
added a commit
to JonathanBrouwer/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 2, 2026
…=marcoieni Remove old MinGW workaround Before mingw-w64/mingw-w64@dbfdf80 mkstemp used by Binutils was not sufficiently collision resilient and that led to CI errors for us. Our new baseline mingw-w64 toolchain's Binutils are built using mingw-w64 with the fix: niXman/mingw-builds#682 So, we should be able to get rid of it. Fixes rust-lang#108227
JonathanBrouwer
added a commit
to JonathanBrouwer/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 5, 2026
…=marcoieni Remove old MinGW workaround Before mingw-w64/mingw-w64@dbfdf80 mkstemp used by Binutils was not sufficiently collision resilient and that led to CI errors for us. Our new baseline mingw-w64 toolchain's Binutils are built using mingw-w64 with the fix: niXman/mingw-builds#682 So, we should be able to get rid of it. Fixes rust-lang#108227
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 5, 2026
Rollup merge of #158021 - mati865:mingw-remove-workaround, r=marcoieni Remove old MinGW workaround Before mingw-w64/mingw-w64@dbfdf80 mkstemp used by Binutils was not sufficiently collision resilient and that led to CI errors for us. Our new baseline mingw-w64 toolchain's Binutils are built using mingw-w64 with the fix: niXman/mingw-builds#682 So, we should be able to get rid of it. Fixes #108227
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Update host toolchain to 14.2.0-rt_v12-rev0 to fix #676.
The updated host toolchain discovered several bugs in the crt patches. They are also fixed in this PR.
Finally, the script no longer attempts to download (non-existent) sjlj host toolchains and tells the user to install one manually.