infra(makemake): reduce nix-eval-jobs workers count#2252
Merged
Conversation
It increases the evaluation time on makemake by 2.5mins Before: real 2m48.862s After: real 5m25.314s Signed-off-by: phanirithvij <phanirithvij2000@gmail.com>
phanirithvij
force-pushed
the
reduce-eval-job-workers
branch
from
542bd50 to
4537f39
Compare
phanirithvij
changed the title
eljamm
approved these changes
Apr 1, 2026
Contributor
|
This doesn't solve the issue, unfortunately. Although from the metrics it doesn't seem that we're OOM, the eval still fails when it reaches bonfire. |
eljamm
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 6, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It increases the evaluation time on makemake by 2.5mins
Before:
real 2m48.862s
After:
real 5m25.314s
This is not ideal and hopefully a temporary workaround until we think of a better solution, but required for unblocking #2251 #2227