-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Release 1.0 #219
Release 1.0 #219
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Daniel Lundin <[email protected]>
Last PR before the release
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Got 221/243 files, missing are subworkflows & workflow, might be able to do that tomorrow.
Looks good so far! I think my comments are all not critical. I might have commented what turned out later wasnt relevant, sorry for that.
Thanks a bunch for that @d4straub ! Perfect to have something to work on. |
Co-authored-by: Daniel Straub <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Daniel Straub <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Daniel Straub <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Daniel Straub <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Daniel Straub <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Daniel Straub <[email protected]>
Update README.md
Update nextflow.config
Update nextflow_schema.json
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks almost good to me.
In hindsight, to me as a reviewer, the biggest problem seems that the test that are existing are not executed using ci.yml
.
Co-authored-by: Daniel Straub <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Daniel Straub <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Daniel Straub <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Daniel Straub <[email protected]>
Fix eggnog download
collect log prokka in a proper way
…bworkflow removed param eggnog_dbpath from subworkflow
Test solving lint issue
|
||
This version number will be logged in reports when you run the pipeline, so that you'll know what you used when you look back in the future. | ||
By default, the pipeline uses prodigal (`--orf_caller prodigal` ) to call genes/ORFs from the assembly. | ||
This is suitable for prokaryotes, as is the Prokka alternative (`--orf_caller prokka`). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hasn't Prokka been succeeded by Bakta now?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I didn't hear about it and I was just looking at their documentation. I know prokka can handle metatranscriptome and it looks like bakta is made primarily for MAGs.
Co-authored-by: Mahesh Binzer-Panchal <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Mahesh Binzer-Panchal <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Mahesh Binzer-Panchal <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Mahesh Binzer-Panchal <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Mahesh Binzer-Panchal <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Mahesh Binzer-Panchal <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Mahesh Binzer-Panchal <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Mahesh Binzer-Panchal <[email protected]>
By the way, you can use the files changed tab to add all suggestions to a single commit. |
ah ok, good to know 😅 |
PR checklist
nf-core lint
).nextflow run . -profile test,docker --outdir <OUTDIR>
).docs/usage.md
is updated.docs/output.md
is updated.CHANGELOG.md
is updated.README.md
is updated (including new tool citations and authors/contributors).PR for metatdenovo v1.0 release