-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 736
docs: Add rnaseq-nf tutorial #6440
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
docs: Add rnaseq-nf tutorial #6440
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Christopher Hakkaart <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Christopher Hakkaart <[email protected]>
✅ Deploy Preview for nextflow-docs-staging ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
Signed-off-by: Christopher Hakkaart <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Christopher Hakkaart <[email protected]>
@bentsherman - This is what I was thinking for a precursor for many of the guides/tutorials in development. I've tried to keep it reasonably high level, but enough to explain what runs, and where it can be found. I was thinking about linking to the specific files in the repo, i.e., when referring to the entry workflow or module, link to those in GitHub. Let me know what you think. |
Signed-off-by: Christopher Hakkaart <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Christopher Hakkaart <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Christopher Hakkaart <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Christopher Hakkaart <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Christopher Hakkaart <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ben Sherman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ben Sherman <[email protected]>
Thanks Chris, looks good so far. I just updated the rnaseq-nf source code to align better with the initial version of the workflow outputs tutorial, and I updated this PR accordingly. However now I think I might have updated rnaseq-nf "too much" by joining the fastqc/quant results into a single channel. That ends up making the workflow outputs tutorial "too simple." So I might revert rnaseq-nf back to having separate fastqc/quant channels so that the tutorial can still show how to join them to prepare for workflow outputs. Need to think a bit more about this |
Nice! The changes look great. I see what you mean about the separate fastqc/quant channels. I think it would be beneficial to still display this, as it's likely a common use case and could be considered a learning outcome. I'm going to explore presenting code in the Migrating to workflow outputs as separate code blocks or tabs, labeled or tagged to indicate their origin. It might look terrible, be unclear, and/or disrupt the flow, so I may not proceed with it further. I'm just flagging that I may create a draft PR to show what it looks like. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.