-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 400
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
1.2.0 produces restify errors #101
Comments
Hey Sander, sorry that you've run into another problem with New Relic. I'll see if I can reproduce your problem from these stacktraces and will let you know if that's not enough. One quick question: are you still using |
Hi Forrest, you have a good memory ;) I checked and longjohn is still disabled for the app (it obviously hasn't acted on the stacktraces above). Thanks for looking into it! |
Hi Forrest, any progress on this? |
Right now I'm working on coming up with a test case where I can see the error. We have functional tests for Restify, and they're working fine. What's the middleware configuration for your app look like? |
Over the course of the last week we finally traced these errors to unrelated causes. We were apparently blindsided by a combination of the trace messages leading to newrelic, the fact that it happened upon an |
My favorite kind of issues! Sorry we couldn't be of more use to you in bringing this to a speedy resolution, though. Thanks for the followup! |
…/log-generator/semver-6.3.1 chore(deps): bump semver from 6.3.0 to 6.3.1 in /log-generator
changed secret for gh token to use org level secret
CLM for Next.js middleware, getServerSideProps, and API handlers
Immediately after upgrading newrelic from 1.1.1 to 1.2.0 in our restify server, all requests fail with two different error messages:
This error is emitted through our HTML formatter upon a valid request:
And worse, this uncaught exception is produced when a non-existant route is requested:
I'm not sure what information I should provide about our application, maybe the stacktraces alone are enough for you guys. If not, please ask!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: