Skip to content

If we want an actual fallback implementation for timegm, there are some... #2337

@jimklimov

Description

@jimklimov
          FYI, if we want an actual fallback implementation for `timegm`, there are some here:

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/16647819/timegm-cross-platform

The one from boost should be license compatible and easy to port.

Originally posted by @EchterAgo in #2184 (comment)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    C-timeIssues and PRs about C/C++ methods, headers and data types dealing with timeenhancementportabilityWe want NUT to build and run everywhere possible

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions