Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update dependency dotenv to v16.4.5 #1624

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 25, 2024

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Feb 10, 2024

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
dotenv 16.4.1 -> 16.4.5 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

motdotla/dotenv (dotenv)

v16.4.5

Compare Source

Changed
  • 🐞 fix recent regression when using path option. return to historical behavior: do not attempt to auto find .env if path set. (regression was introduced in 16.4.3) #​814

v16.4.4

Compare Source

Changed
  • 🐞 Replaced chaining operator ?. with old school && (fixing node 12 failures) #​812

v16.4.3

Compare Source

Changed
  • Fixed processing of multiple files in options.path #​805

v16.4.2

Compare Source

Changed

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update dependency dotenv to v16.4.2 fix(deps): update dependency dotenv to v16.4.3 Feb 12, 2024
@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update dependency dotenv to v16.4.3 fix(deps): update dependency dotenv to v16.4.4 Feb 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant