-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
v3.7.5 #3330
v3.7.5 #3330
Conversation
* fix 3300 * update format * add state subitems to ref counter, with suggestion from DuSmart * apply hardfork * format * my mistake * fix hardfork * remove negative check * add unit test * apply anna's suggestion --------- Co-authored-by: Shargon <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: NGD Admin <[email protected]>
It's not correct to use an updated contract state got from native Management to check for the allowed method call. We need to use manifest from the currently executing context for that. It may be critical for cases when executing contract is being updated firstly, and after that it calls another contract. So we need an old (executing) contract manifest for this check. This change is moved under D hardfork to avoid state diff issues on nodes update. Although it should be noted that it's hard to meet the trigger criteria. A port of nspcc-dev/neo-go#3473. This bug was discovered during the similar problem described in nspcc-dev/neo-go#3471 and fixed in nspcc-dev/neo-go#3472. I've checked all other similar usages and the rest of them use proper contract state (executing one, not the Management's one). Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Shargon <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Jimmy <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Vitor Nazário Coelho <[email protected]>
Merge #3320 before, for tests locally to work |
Ref. neo-project/neo#3330. Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <[email protected]>
Ref. neo-project/neo#3330. Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <[email protected]>
Otherwise this configuration file is broken. Port changes from nspcc-dev/neo-go#3446. Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <[email protected]>
@AnnaShaleva @cschuchardt88 Could you review again? |
Not criticial for this hotfix. We can put it into v3.8.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Otherwise LGTM.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LgTM
v3.7.5 hotfix