Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix #589, promote OS_ObjectIdToArrayIndex to public API #595

Merged

Conversation

jphickey
Copy link
Contributor

@jphickey jphickey commented Sep 9, 2020

Describe the contribution

Move this existing function into the public API, as it is performs more verification than the OS_ConvertToArrayIndex
function.

Fixes #589

Testing performed
Build and sanity test CFE
Run all tests

Expected behavior changes
None.

System(s) tested on
Ubuntu 20.04

Additional context
No change to function, just moved to public API.

Contributor Info - All information REQUIRED for consideration of pull request
Joseph Hickey, Vantage Systems, Inc.

Move this existing function into the public API, as it is
performs more verification than the OS_ConvertToArrayIndex
function.
@jphickey jphickey added CCB:Ready Pull request is ready for discussion at the Configuration Control Board (CCB) enhancement labels Sep 9, 2020
@astrogeco
Copy link
Contributor

astrogeco commented Sep 9, 2020

CCB 2020-09-09 APPROVED, Added Public API label

@yammajamma yammajamma added IC-20200909 and removed CCB:Ready Pull request is ready for discussion at the Configuration Control Board (CCB) labels Sep 10, 2020
@yammajamma yammajamma merged commit 67c0f88 into nasa:integration-candidate Sep 10, 2020
@jphickey jphickey deleted the fix-589-objid-to-arrayindex branch December 3, 2020 17:26
@skliper skliper added this to the 6.0.0 milestone Sep 24, 2021
jphickey pushed a commit to jphickey/osal that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2022
Fix nasa#456, Perf log threading and concurrency issues
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants