-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 217
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix #509, Remove uintmax_t usage #510
Fix #509, Remove uintmax_t usage #510
Conversation
Some systems may not provide this type. Using "unsigned long" instead should be sufficient.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
long long? Is an address ever returned (I'd think it could be).
It's in a union with a (FWIW even an old gcc 4.3.3 should definitely provide this type, I didn't dig into it much to see if there was perhaps some other reason it failed, but the regular |
CCB 2020-06-17: APPROVED |
Fix nasa#509, Executive Services Requirements Scrub
Describe the contribution
Some systems may not provide this type. Using
unsigned long
instead should be sufficient.Fixes #509
Testing performed
Build on vxworks
Run all unit tests on native system and on RTEMS.
Expected behavior changes
No impact to behavior
System(s) tested on
Ubuntu 20.04
GSFC VxWorks lab build machine (gs582w-cfelnx)
Contributor Info - All information REQUIRED for consideration of pull request
Joseph Hickey, Vantage Systems, Inc.