Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

69 rc1.0.3 #70

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Feb 3, 2022
Merged

69 rc1.0.3 #70

merged 6 commits into from
Feb 3, 2022

Conversation

jlucas9
Copy link
Collaborator

@jlucas9 jlucas9 commented Feb 3, 2022

Is this ready to roll?

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Feb 3, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #70 (332916c) into collab_main (34c6245) will decrease coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 91.37%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##           collab_main      #70      +/-   ##
===============================================
- Coverage        81.64%   81.62%   -0.03%     
===============================================
  Files               17       17              
  Lines             3940     3941       +1     
===============================================
  Hits              3217     3217              
- Misses             723      724       +1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
util/src_util/ut_kmc_crypto_with_mtls_sadb.c 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/src_main/crypto_tm.c 5.00% <10.00%> (-0.03%) ⬇️
src/src_main/crypto_key_mgmt.c 32.53% <25.00%> (ø)
src/src_main/crypto_mc.c 81.11% <80.00%> (ø)
src/src_main/sadb_routine_inmemory.template.c 68.50% <82.14%> (ø)
...gcrypt/cryptography_interface_libgcrypt.template.c 81.37% <88.88%> (ø)
util/src_util/et_dt_validation.c 98.21% <98.62%> (ø)
src/src_main/crypto.c 98.98% <100.00%> (ø)
src/src_main/crypto_aos.c 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/src_main/crypto_config.c 95.52% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 6 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 34c6245...332916c. Read the comment docs.

static int32_t sadb_get_operational_sa_from_gvcid(uint8_t, uint16_t, uint16_t, uint8_t, SecurityAssociation_t **);
static int32_t sadb_save_sa(SecurityAssociation_t *sa);
static int32_t sadb_get_sa_from_spi(uint16_t, SecurityAssociation_t* *);
static int32_t sadb_get_operational_sa_from_gvcid(uint8_t, uint16_t, uint16_t, uint8_t, SecurityAssociation_t* *);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

SecurityAssociation_t** is better... The * * with the space concerns me -- probably works?

(the same * * thing happens in a number of places

Copy link
Contributor

@IbraheemYSaleh IbraheemYSaleh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 I don't see profiling messages with this branch and it builds fine...

Only thing I don't like is the "* *" pointer-pointers, instead of "**"

@@ -81,7 +83,7 @@ int32_t Crypto_Key_OTAR(void)
}

count = sdls_frame.pdu.pdu_len - MAC_SIZE;
for (int w = 0; w < 16; w++)
for (w = 0; w < 16; w++)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I disagree with pulling out the declaration like this 👎 ... works though /shrug.

@jlucas9 jlucas9 merged commit 156d798 into collab_main Feb 3, 2022
@dccutrig dccutrig deleted the 69-rc1.0.3 branch March 1, 2022 15:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants