Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

287 consider open source code scanner extensions and update codecov #290

Conversation

Donnie-Ice
Copy link
Contributor

Added CodeQL scanning, codecov was updated externally

@Donnie-Ice Donnie-Ice self-assigned this Sep 4, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@rjbrown2 rjbrown2 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is pretty slick.
Was able to watch scan, create vulnerability issues, and close out.
Will be very helpful.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Sep 4, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 5 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 83.51%. Comparing base (668efc3) to head (31bf6eb).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/sa/internal/sa_interface_inmemory.template.c 0.00% 5 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              dev     #290   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   83.51%   83.51%           
=======================================
  Files          39       39           
  Lines       11074    11074           
  Branches      835      835           
=======================================
  Hits         9249     9249           
  Misses       1518     1518           
  Partials      307      307           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Donnie-Ice Donnie-Ice merged commit 5dadca4 into dev Sep 4, 2024
7 checks passed
@Donnie-Ice Donnie-Ice deleted the 287-consider-open-source-code-scanner-extensions-and-update-codecov branch September 4, 2024 18:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants