-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
197 aes gcm siv #265
197 aes gcm siv #265
Conversation
@jlucas9 |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## dev #265 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 82.68% 82.84% +0.16%
==========================================
Files 40 41 +1
Lines 10026 10337 +311
Branches 814 830 +16
==========================================
+ Hits 8290 8564 +274
- Misses 1437 1472 +35
- Partials 299 301 +2 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Can we fix or verify the issues with the RHEL/WOLF builds before we approve, please? |
3b95f7f
to
48a19cd
Compare
@@ -422,6 +422,20 @@ static int32_t cryptography_encrypt(uint8_t* data_out, size_t len_data_out, | |||
} | |||
break; | |||
|
|||
// TODO: Confirm same process as above for SIV |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should these three new comment blocks be removed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, good catch.
Allows for AES-GCM-SIV Enc/Dec. Examples are supplied via unit tests in
ut_aes_gcm_siv.c
.