Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add CloudFormation Guard (GitHub Actions) #60

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Feb 8, 2024
Merged

Add CloudFormation Guard (GitHub Actions) #60

merged 11 commits into from
Feb 8, 2024

Conversation

nao1215
Copy link
Owner

@nao1215 nao1215 commented Feb 8, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a new GitHub Actions workflow named "CloudFormation Guard Action" to enforce reliability and security best practices on CloudFormation templates upon push events.
    • Refined triggering conditions for deployment to LocalStack by specifying paths to trigger the workflow only for changes in the cloudformation directory.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 8, 2024

Important

Auto Review Skipped

Review was skipped due to path filters

Files ignored due to path filters (3)
  • cloudformation/cloudwatch-rum/template.yml is excluded by: !**/*.yml
  • cloudformation/lambda-batch/template.yml is excluded by: !**/*.yml
  • cloudformation/static-web-site-distribution/template.yml is excluded by: !**/*.yml

Walkthrough

This update introduces a new GitHub Actions workflow named "CloudFormation Guard Action," which activates upon modifications to files within the cloudformation/ directory. It leverages the grolston/guard-action to apply specific rule sets, focusing on reliability and security pillars, to CloudFormation templates. This ensures that changes adhere to defined best practices and standards, enhancing the overall quality and security of the infrastructure as code.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/cfn-guard.yml Added to run "CloudFormation Guard Action" on push events for cloudformation/ directory files, enforcing "wa-Reliability-Pillar" and "wa-Security-Pillar" rules.

🐇✨
In the realm of code, where Clouds form and sway,
A guard hops in, with rules to convey.
"For reliability and security, I stand tall,
Ensuring your templates falter not, no not at all!"
🌈🚀

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 1

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c3497b2 and d2d708e.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/cfn-guard.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 5
.github/workflows/cfn-guard.yml (5)
  • 1-1: Ensure the workflow name accurately reflects its purpose for clarity and maintainability.
  • 3-6: Trigger conditions are correctly set to activate the workflow on push events affecting the cloudformation/** directory.
  • 12-12: Correct use of the actions/checkout@v4 to ensure the repository's code is available for the workflow.
  • 14-17: The first invocation of grolston/guard-action is correctly configured to enforce the "wa-Reliability-Pillar" rule set on CloudFormation templates.
  • 19-22: The second invocation of grolston/guard-action is correctly configured to enforce the "wa-Security-Pillar" rule set on CloudFormation templates.

Comment on lines +8 to +22
jobs:
cfn-guard:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4

- uses: grolston/guard-action@main
with:
data_directory: './cloudformation/'
rule_set: "wa-Reliability-Pillar"

- uses: grolston/guard-action@main
with:
data_directory: './cloudformation/'
rule_set: "wa-Security-Pillar"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider combining the CloudFormation Guard actions into a single step if the action supports multiple rule sets. This could reduce redundancy and potentially speed up the workflow execution.

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d2d708e and 5e2f9a1.
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • cloudformation/static-web-site-distribution/template.yml is excluded by: !**/*.yml
Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/cfn-guard.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/cloudformation.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/cfn-guard.yml
Additional comments: 2
.github/workflows/cloudformation.yml (2)
  • 5-6: The paths triggering condition is correctly refined to target changes in the cloudformation/** directory, aligning with the PR objectives to focus on CloudFormation templates.
  • 2-9: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [8-33]

All steps in the job configuration are correctly set up and necessary for deploying to LocalStack. The use of environment variables and secrets is secure and appropriate for the context of this workflow.

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 8, 2024

HOTTEST report

PASS FAIL SKIP TOTAL DURATION
283 0 7 290 2.106022399s

Reported by hottest

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 8, 2024

Code Metrics Report

main (c3497b2) #60 (633cc8e) +/-
Coverage 22.4% 22.4% 0.0%
Test Execution Time 36s 4s -32s
Details
  |                     | main (c3497b2) | #60 (633cc8e) | +/-  |
  |---------------------|----------------|---------------|------|
  | Coverage            |          22.4% |         22.4% | 0.0% |
  |   Files             |             52 |            52 |    0 |
  |   Lines             |           1829 |          1829 |    0 |
  |   Covered           |            409 |           409 |    0 |
+ | Test Execution Time |            36s |            4s | -32s |

Reported by octocov

@nao1215 nao1215 merged commit fadaeee into main Feb 8, 2024
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant