Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix required for build with RelWithDebInfo #774

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 28, 2018

Conversation

josesimoes
Copy link
Member

@josesimoes josesimoes commented Jun 28, 2018

Description

  • Add pragmas to keep the compiler happy with -O2

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshots

Types of changes

  • Improvement (non-breaking change that improves a feature, code or algorithm)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

Signed-off-by: José Simões [email protected]

@nfbot
Copy link
Member

nfbot commented Jun 28, 2018

Hi @josesimoes,

I'm nanoFramework bot.
Thank you for your contribution!

A human will be reviewing it shortly. 😉

@josesimoes josesimoes added Type: enhancement Area: Interpreter Everything related with the interpreter, execution engine and such labels Jun 28, 2018
@josesimoes josesimoes merged commit ea096a5 into nanoframework:develop Jun 28, 2018
@josesimoes josesimoes deleted the fix-for-optimization branch June 28, 2018 13:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Area: Interpreter Everything related with the interpreter, execution engine and such Type: enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants