Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Correct implementation of Debugging_Deployment_Status #610

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 12, 2018

Conversation

josesimoes
Copy link
Member

Description

  • Correct implementation of Debugging_Deployment_Status

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshots

Types of changes

  • Improvement (non-breaking change that improves a feature, code or algorithm)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

Signed-off-by: José Simões [email protected]

@josesimoes josesimoes added Type: enhancement Area: Interpreter Everything related with the interpreter, execution engine and such labels Feb 12, 2018
@nfbot
Copy link
Member

nfbot commented Feb 12, 2018

Hi @josesimoes,

I'm nanoFramework bot.
Thank you for your contribution!

A human will be reviewing it shortly. 😉

@josesimoes josesimoes merged commit 411f999 into nanoframework:develop Feb 12, 2018
@josesimoes josesimoes deleted the implement-135 branch February 12, 2018 20:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Area: Interpreter Everything related with the interpreter, execution engine and such Type: enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add support for IncrementalDeployment in Debugging_Deployment_Status processing
2 participants