Repository navigation
chore(main): release 0.2.0 - #32
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughRelease metadata was updated from version 0.1.1 to 0.2.0 across marketplace, package, plugin, and release manifests. The changelog documents the 0.2.0 runtime feature and eight CI/release fixes. ChangesRelease metadata and notes
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes Possibly related PRs
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
fb359f6 to
e08d95a
Compare
|
@codex review |
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Action performedReview finished.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@CHANGELOG.md`:
- Around line 19-20: Clarify the duplicate 0.2.0 candidate-recovery entries in
CHANGELOG.md by either giving the two commits distinct release-note subjects
when they represent different fixes or removing one entry when they are
duplicates.
🪄 Autofix
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 65cd1e7a-71cd-42d0-b35b-aaf196ccad43
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
.claude-plugin/marketplace.json.github/.release-please-manifest.jsonCHANGELOG.mdpackage.jsonplugin.config.jsonplugin/.claude-plugin/plugin.jsonplugin/.codex-plugin/plugin.json
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. What shall we delve into next? Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
|
@codex review |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Hooray! Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
|
@coderabbitai review |
|
|
@codex-gate approve 9f877de 5231239749 |
|
To use Codex here, create an environment for this repo. |
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Action performedReview finished.
|
Release Please emitted one bullet for the merge commit of #38 and another for the feature commit inside it, so the same logical change is listed twice with identical text. Keeps the merge reference 7ee948c, which is the commit that landed the change on main, and drops 4b4c838. This follows #32, which resolved the same duplication in the 0.2.0 notes by removing the redundant line.
* chore(main): release 0.4.0 * docs(release): deduplicate the 0.4.0 Codex update note Release Please emitted one bullet for the merge commit of #38 and another for the feature commit inside it, so the same logical change is listed twice with identical text. Keeps the merge reference 7ee948c, which is the commit that landed the change on main, and drops 4b4c838. This follows #32, which resolved the same duplication in the 0.2.0 notes by removing the redundant line. --------- Co-authored-by: Nathan Vale <hi@nathanvale.com>
🤖 I have created a release beep boop
0.2.0 (2026-08-09)
Features
Bug Fixes
This PR was generated with Release Please. See documentation.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release
Documentation